Res10 P-2107 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

~i' . ... ~J iJ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ Mi.' ~1 ~il ~ :\" 0;1 m ~ 11- ~ ~. I,; l~ fl ~ 2, Revisions to the Draft EIR California State Lands Commission's rules. regulations. F!llidelines and oolicies: and (ft gather. and make available oerformance data developed from soecific pr01ects, These activities would complement the functions of local building deoartments and local plannin~ deoartments. none of which are nresentlv staffed to provide soils insoections. 2. Even if the Bay Pian indicates that a fill may be pemtissible. no fill or building should be constructed if hazards cannot be overcome adequatelY for the intended use in accordance with. the criteria orescnoed bv the Ene:ineering Criteria Review Board. 3. To provide vitally-needed information on the effects of earthquakes on all kinds of soils. installation of strong-motion seismographs should be required on all future maior landfills. In addition. the Commission encouraJ!es installation of strom~-motion seismographs in other develooments on problem soils. and in other areas recommended by the U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey. for oumoses of data comnarison and evaluation. .... ~j ~ ~1 ~J ~ ]J ~J n M .~l 51 t 4. To prevent damage from flooding. structures on fill or near the shoreline should have adeauate flood orotection including consideration of future relative sea level rise as deterinined bv competent engineers. As a general rule. structures on fill or near the shoreline should be above the wave ronuo level or sufficientlv set back from the edge of the shore so that the structure is not subiect to dYnamic wave enerf!V. In all cases. the bottom floor level of structures should be above the highest estimated tide elevation. Exceotions to the general hei IDlt rule may be made for developments soecifically desie:ned to tolerate oeriodic flooding. 5. To minimize the potential hazard to Bav fill proiects and bavside development from subsidence. all orooosed developments should be sufficientlv high above the highest estimated tide level for the expected life of the project or sufficiently orotected bv levees to allow for the effects of additional subsidence for the expected life of the proiect. utilizing the latest intbrmation available from the V.S, Geological Survev and the National Ocean Service. Rights-or-wav for levees protecting inland areas from tidal flooding should be sufficiently wide on the unland side to allow for future levee widening to support additional levee height so that no fill for levee widening is placed in the Bay, 6. Local governments and soecial districts with resoonsibilities for flood protection should assure that their requirements and criteria reflect future relative sea level rise and should assure that new structures and uses attracting people are not anoroved in flood Drone areas or in areas that will become flood prone in the future. and that structures and uses that are approvable will be built at stable elevations to assure 10DI!-term protection from.flood hazards, [BeDel A/so, the following text has been corrected on page 4,0-15 (last paragraph): The existing wharfis curr~ntly protected by a 9.5-foot high concrete seawall to prevent Bay water at high tide from flooding upland areas. The proposed project would construct a 12-foot high seawall as part of the proposed new wharf construction. This additional ~ Wharves 1 and 2 RedevekJpment Prnlac:l Anal EnvlronlTl8nlallmpad Report 2-4 ESA /20neo July 2010