My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
CC Min 2002-12-09 Reg
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2002
>
CC Min 2002-12-09 Reg
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/5/2005 2:40:54 PM
Creation date
1/17/2003 8:30:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council & Redevelopment
Date
12/9/2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
expenditure of $26M of Redwood City funds to fund a parking structure primarily for <br /> the exclusive use of the theatre project. <br /> <br /> Daniela Gasparini stated that she is past Chair to the Chamber of Commeme that had <br /> voted in favor of the project when the DDA was approved in 2001. Although there was <br /> not sufficient time to present to the Board and members the current DDA proposal, <br /> there were three past Chaire at the meeting to speak in support. She further stated <br /> that she cannot wait to walk or drive to see a movie at the new theatre and utilize the <br /> retail component of the project. Ms. Gasparini stated that the underground parking <br /> access should be studied to provide more than one way in or out and monitoring of <br /> the traffic flow in the area would be helpful. <br /> <br /> Keith Bautista compared the vision and leadership, along with patience and <br /> persistence involved in the building of the 1,800 mile railroad line in the 1860's to that <br /> of the Retail/Cinema project. He stated that in the years to come many seen and <br /> unseen benefits will be realized and he strongly recommended a positive vote on the <br /> project. <br /> <br /> John Anagnostou, resident and co-owner of the Fox Theatre and the Little Fox, stated <br /> that some points in the proposal were made that need clarification. He stated that <br /> people are motivated by love and fear, but that fear was mostly being expressed on <br /> this subject. He stated that the love from the project will be exhibited by the people <br /> coming to this vacant town and that there is not really a parking problem. He asked <br /> that clarification occur and that everyone realize that tough decisions need to be made <br />-- or the town will continue to sit idle. <br /> <br /> Matt Matteson, building owner at 1991 Broadway, stated that he was speaking for <br /> those who have followed the call to invest in Redwood City and that the theater project <br /> is one that excited the investors and is clearly one that they welcome. He stated that <br /> he believes that not only will people come and spend money Downtown, but that <br /> tenants and owners will invest in their spaces as a result of the theatre project. He <br /> urged Council to keep the big picture and help them continue to invest in Redwood <br /> City. <br /> <br /> Recess: 9:00-9:30 p.m. <br /> <br /> Council Member Hartnett made the following responses to questions: <br /> <br /> · The issue of the Redwood City parking garage costs - stated that the present value <br /> is approximately $22M. The City receives in return for that, the $20M garage asset. <br /> This value does not take into consideration any revenues generated by the project <br /> or parking; any value obtained with respect to Block 2; or revenue generated from <br /> operations in Block 2 such as transient occupancy tax. <br /> <br /> REGULAR MEETING CITY COUNCIL, BOARD OF DECEMBER 9, 2002 <br />__ EQUALIZATION AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES PAGE 7 <br /> <br /> MINUTES Book No. 59 <br /> Page No. 331 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.