Laserfiche WebLink
9-�-Z <br />homeowners as a result of water rationing), then the use of recycled water is worth the risk. <br />But that is not the case. <br />The benefit of the doubt ought to be given to the potential for adverse health consequences <br />regardless of drought over the potential for brown lawns in case ofdrou_pht. <br />4) Devaluation of Property. With realtors compelled to disclose the use of recycled water, <br />the debate of safety becomes irrelevant with regard to property sales. Perception is reality — <br />and with a disclosure requirement regarding the use of recycled water — the reality will be <br />that buyers will understand that homes under mandatory recycled water use are inferior to <br />those using potable water. <br />5) Buyers in New Developments will have Choice. Making NEW developments subject to <br />recycled water use is fair. Those consumers will be able to choose whether or not to buy or <br />rent a home where recycled water is being used. <br />Enclosures <br />1. Letter from The Safewater Coalition <br />2. Two Newspaper Articles regarding EPA Backtracking on "Acceptable levels of risk" <br />3. Report from California Recycled Water Task Force <br />