Laserfiche WebLink
6.1 I <br /> Page 7 <br /> Mr.Sailesh Mehra � <br /> City of Redwood City <br /> Juiy 2,2010 <br /> Page 2 <br /> applicanfi in an effort to resolve this issue.TexC changes were made to the DE1R to address this issue, <br /> and included the addition oE a new mitigation measure.Mr.Jeffrey Smith spent 32 hours of time on <br /> this task,for an out of scope cost of$4,736. � <br /> Task 4 FEiR <br /> Task 4 incIudes the preparation of the Final EIR(FEIR).RMT is requesting that hours originally <br /> intended for junior staff be transferred to Mr.Jeffrey Smith in order to expedite the compietion of�he <br /> FEIR.Theze are a number of reasons for this request,including the extremely short timeline tor <br /> completion of the Admi�nisbrative Final EIR(AFEIR),the need for senior level staff to review and <br /> incorporate the wvrk produced by the M Group into the AFEII�and the fact that Mr.Smith is tk�e <br /> only member of RMT s#aff currently Eully up to dafe on the Laurel Way project.The existing <br /> approved scope provides 40 hours for junior sta€f to prepare Ehe AFEIR, a�d ari additional 2�hours to <br /> prepare fille FEIR,RMT requests that these 60 hours be transferred to Mr.Smith.The billing xate#or <br /> junior staff is$88 per hour,while the biliing rate for Mr.Smith is$148 an hour-a dilference o�f$60 an <br /> hour.The b�dge#augment resul.#ing from this�ransfer of hours would be$3,600. <br /> Earlier this week,RMT staff was pxovided with a copy of the approved meeting mulutes for the <br /> Apri16,2010 Planning Commission public hearing.RMT sta�f reviewed these minutes and found that <br /> many of the public comments made at the meeting either were not inco�rporated into the official <br /> minutes,or were incomplete.The FEIR must include responses to comments made at the public <br /> hearing,and fherefore the minutes need to be revised to more accurately xeflect the comments made <br /> at the rneeting.RMT staff is requesti�ng a budget augment of$1,184 for s#aff to revise these minutes <br /> and submit the revisions to the Planning Commission for adoption.A separate itexn under Task 5, <br /> below,includes the cos�for attending the Juiy 20,2010 Planning Commission meeting for khe review <br /> and adoption of the revised minutes. <br /> Yask 5 l�eetings and Communication <br /> Task 5 includes meetings and communication.Ak City staff request,RMT is requesting a budget <br /> augment to have four technical subconsultants pxesent aE the August I7,2�I0 Pla�nning Commission <br /> hearing in order to address questions or comments related to their areas of specialty.The specific <br /> subconsultant firms to be present at the meeting and the cost recZuirements for each are listed below: <br /> Foo�e�z <br />