My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2003-02-24
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2003
>
AgdaPkt 2003-02-24
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/2/2011 2:46:44 PM
Creation date
2/20/2003 3:10:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council & Redevelopment
Date
2/24/2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
189
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
q.A -IZ <br />PEACEfrom page1 .................. ............................... <br />Referring to the state's huge deficit he said, <br />"The quicker you fix the problem the quicker you <br />whittle it down, but it also makes you Public Enemy <br />#1. The feelings of anger and betrayal experienced <br />by local government are the same as the feelings in <br />the education and health care communities." <br />He said that the core of the Administration's <br />proposal is the $8.2 billion "realignment" piece — the <br />proposal to shift health and welfare programs from <br />the state to counties and accompany those pro- <br />grams with dedicated revenues. This approach <br />makes sense, he said, because the services are at <br />a level of government that is closer to the popula- <br />tions being served. Passing the realignment keeps <br />the services, but also keeps state government <br />funded at a level that doesn't trigger the constitu- <br />tional requirements to increase funding for educa- <br />tion. But achieving the realignment requires pas- <br />sage of the $8.3 billion in tax increases proposed by <br />the Governor — a 1 cent increase in sales tax; a <br />$1.10 per pack increase in cigarette sales; and <br />raising the personal income tax level for the top <br />income levels. <br />"We haven't been able to get people to focus on <br />the consequences of not getting the tax increases <br />the Governor has asked for," said Peace. <br />Board members had many questions for the <br />new Finance Director about why the Governor <br />proposed to break a promise made to local govern- <br />ment about continuing VLF funding for cities and <br />counties. Many spoke strongly about the sense of <br />betrayal felt by local officials, and the difficulty of <br />working with the state on structural reform issues <br />when the state was again proving itself untrustwor- <br />thy. <br />"Tell your boss that $4 billion in VLF is important <br />to this room, along with keeping promises ", said <br />Thousand Oaks Mayor Andy Fox. <br />ture. He acknowledged further that the Governor <br />would probably have to pull the VLF "trigger" and <br />reinstate the higher VLF fees before June — even <br />without AB 4X. <br />"My advice to the League is that you don't win <br />early," he said, arguing that doing so would make <br />local government a target for other groups con- <br />cerned about funding later in the budget process. <br />Speaking of the Governor's announcement that <br />he plans to veto AB 4X, Peace said, "There are <br />fundamentally different legal opinions about the <br />trigger. The decision last year that there was a <br />need for clarification (of the law calling for the <br />trigger) was based upon one lawyer's opinion. The <br />issue for us today is which statute do we want to <br />defend. Lawyers for the Department of Finance, <br />the Governor and the Controller all agree that they <br />would rather defend pulling the trigger under the <br />current law than under AB 4X." <br />"We believe the trigger will pull," he continued, <br />but that it's going to pay off in the end if everyone <br />gets involved in the budget discussions. <br />Oakland Mayor and former Governor Jerry <br />Brown attended the meeting and spoke following Mr. <br />Peace's remarks about his experiences with Propo- <br />sition 13. <br />"If I replay the Prop. 13 movie, I should never <br />have trusted the legislature to pass a bill (on <br />property tax reform) ", he said. "They dallied and <br />wasted a year. I should have gone straight to the <br />ballot. The League needs an initiative, something <br />real and popular." <br />Peace agreed with this approach, and urged the <br />League to get involved with other interests in <br />developing a ballot measure to dramatically restruc- <br />ture the state and local fiscal structure. <br />"Take VLF off the table," added Oakland City <br />Attorney and League President John Russo. "The <br />VLF is our (cities' and counties') money." <br />Recognizing the impact that cities and counties <br />were having on the state budget debate, Peace <br />acknowledged that the Governor's plan to leave the <br />VLF backfill unfunded would not pass the legisla- <br />"The Governor's proposal is about structural <br />reform," he said. "There's a window of opportunity <br />to fix this stuff. I encourage you to participate and <br />to involve the business community." <br />Mr. Peace also spoke at the City Managers <br />meeting this week in Monterey, covering much of <br />the same information. <br />PAUL 6 /PRIORITY FOCUS Visit the League's Official Web Site -- www.cacities.org <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.