My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2010-09-13
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2010
>
AgdaPkt 2010-09-13
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/14/2010 2:25:04 PM
Creation date
9/9/2010 4:56:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Redevelopment Agency
Date
9/13/2010
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
372
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />6.3A <br />Page 1 <br /> <br />REPORT <br /> <br />To the Honorable Mayor and City Council <br />From the Ci Mana er <br /> <br />September 13, 2010 <br /> <br />SUBJECT <br />Proposed sale of 3272 Rolison Road ("Property") <br /> <br />RECOMMENDATION <br />Approve, by Resolution, Proposed Process for Sale of 3272 Rolison Road. <br /> <br />BACKGROUND <br />Priorto 1995, the City used grant funds to make a rehabilitation loan for a low-income multifamily <br />complex at 3272 Rolison Road (the "Property"). The City acquired the Property, which contains <br />seven units, when the property owners defaulted on their loans, in order to protect the City's <br />security interest in the Property. The lender in first position had placed the Property in <br />receivership through the San Mateo County Superior Court; the Court appointed Allen & <br />Associates Property Management Company as the property manager. Because the City did not <br />have the ability to manage the Property, it retained Allen & Associates Property Management <br />Company as the property manager. <br /> <br />The City's total cost to acquire the Property was $54,741.46, which was paid from Community <br />Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds. This included (i) the principal balance and accrued <br />interest on the City's rehabilitation loan to the borrower, (ii) the amount required to reinstate the <br />first and second mortgages, and (Iii) payment of delinquent property taxes on the Property. <br />However, no City general funds nor CDBG funding have been used to support the Property. The <br />operating expenses and building improvements have been supported exclusively by rents <br />-received from the tenants. The Property is currently occupied by seven low income households <br />paying rents totaling approximately $70,000 annually. The Property has a first mortgage of <br />approximately $165,000; operating expenses, including mortgage payments, averages around <br />$45,000 annually, for a net income of approximately $25,000. <br /> <br />The City has not offered this Property for sale previously because of the unfavorable and <br />fluctuating neighborhood environment and economic climate. In 1994, the City and <br />Redevelopment Agency collectively acquired some 70 units of housing near the Property, on <br />Rolison Road, for the purpose of revitalizing the neighborhood. As part of its revitalization plan, <br />the City developed and implemented the Friendly Acres Neighborhood Plan ("Plan") to reduce <br />and prevent crime. Over the next three years, the City took numerous steps to implement the <br />Plan, including the installation of many infrastructure improvements such as resurfacing the <br />alley, lighting, flood prevention mechanisms, and fencing, and increasing police patrols to <br />combat gang and drug violence. <br /> <br />Despite these concerted efforts, the neighborhood remained severely depressed for some time. <br />The Police Department reported constant home burglaries, dumping in the alley, drug sales and <br />other illegal activity, including prostitution, as well as other violent crimes, leaving the <br />neighborhood generally feeling unsafe. At that time, the City decided not to offer the Property for <br />sale because the neighborhood was continuing to decline, and because of the number of <br />absentee landlords who failed to maintain their properties. The City did not want the Property to <br />82483.00000\4749656.1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.