Laserfiche WebLink
Al�'` �H�111 E NT 1 <br /> September 27, 2010 <br /> Hon. Clifford V. Cretan <br /> Judge of the Superior Court <br /> Hall of Justice <br /> 400 County Center, 2nd Floor <br /> Redwood City, CA 94063 <br /> Subject: Response to the Grand Jury Report: "City Fire Department Consolidations/Mergers" <br /> Dear Judge Cretan: <br /> On behalf of the City Council of the City of Redwood City, 1 would like to thank you for the opportunity to <br /> respond to the Grand Jury Report dated May 26, 2010, regarding City Fire Depa�tment Consolidations/ <br /> Mergers. The following response to the Grand Jury's Findings and Conclusions was reviewed and <br /> approved by the City Council at its meeting on September 27, 2010. <br /> Findin s <br /> The City has reviewed the 22 findings presented in the Grand Jury Report and is in agreement with the <br /> majority of the findings, provided the data analysis and methodology used was factual and sound. The <br /> City disagrees, partially, with Findings 4, and 9. <br /> • Finding 4: All frre depar�ments have fixed overhead cosfs for administration and management <br /> regardless of the size of the department. Usua!!y fire departments that support large popufations <br /> are more cost effective because their fixed overhead is spread over a larger base. Table 3 above <br /> compares the cost per capita to the population supported. In general, the larger the population <br /> the lower the cosf per capi#a. In addirion to cosf per capita, the cost to support a large <br /> geographica!area should be considered when evaluatinq fhe cost e�ciency of a department. <br /> Respondent disagrees, in part,with this finding. Population served does not necessarily correlate <br /> to cost-effectiveness in service delivery. Overhead costs are fixed based on organizational <br /> structure and are similar among agencies of all size. <br /> • Finding 9: There continues to be a redundancy of fire sfafions with five sifuations where starions <br /> are located within 1-mile of each ofher. These stations were placed by rhe loca!jurisdictions to <br /> fight fires within their city boundaries at a time when "boundary drop" did nor exisf and fire <br /> departmenrs on/y responded to fires ancl other emergenc�es within therr designated boundaries. <br /> Respondent agrees, in part, with this finding. However, geographic obstacles exist between the <br /> station Iocated at 41 Q1 Fair Oaks Avenue and the station located at 1091 2"� Avenue which <br /> creates a barrier between the two communities.Although the Caltrain and Southern Paci�c tracks <br /> do not impede cross traffic as much as they did when the stations were built, they still impact <br /> response delivery from one side to the other. This impact has the potential to increase response <br /> times to areas under consideration. <br /> Conclusions <br /> 9. Complete a study of possible consolidation wrfh neighboring fire departments or contracting with Cal <br /> Fire fo provide the same/eve!of service at reduced cosf by July 1, 2011. <br />