Laserfiche WebLink
PRESS QUOTES from page 1 ...... a ............. .................... . <br />Ventura County Star 2/19103 Editorial: Give <br />voters a stab at budget. The so-called car tax should <br />be the easiest to raise since it was drastically cut in <br />1998, with the stipulation that it would be raised if the <br />state could not reimburse cities for the lost revenue so <br />vital for local services such as police and fire. <br />Modesto Bee 2119/03 Merced council rips <br />budget cuts, By Michael Mello, Bee Staff Writer "What <br />I'm seeing in this budget is that local government takes <br />all the pain," (Senator Jeff) Denham said. "And that's <br />wrong. <br />Sacramento Bee 2/17/03 Dan Walters: Revenue <br />numbers point to a rational way out of crisis. If the <br />annual (structural) gap is bridged by spending reduc- <br />tions and /or revenue increases, the future takes care of <br />itself. Restoring the car tax and repealing other recent <br />tax breaks could cover about half the yearly deficit — a <br />fair approach because those tax cuts were based on <br />irrational revenue assumptions in the first place... <br />The Torrance Daily Breeze 2/14/03 Breeze <br />editorial: Don't siphon funds from cities, transit. The <br />notion of seizing cities' redevelopment funds is so out of <br />bounds that many experts view it as patently illegal. <br />There is no easy way out of the state's budget crisis. <br />But there clearly are better ways than raiding the <br />already committed revenues of local governments. <br />Oakland Tribune 2/14/03 Takeaways will hurt <br />citizens - -Arne CROCE (City Manager of San Mateo): <br />"In making his proposal, the governor and other mem- <br />bers of his administration consistently make an asser- <br />tion that sounds very fair: The state shared the good <br />times with local government, so local government must <br />share the bad times with the state. This is simply not <br />true." "During the economic boom, the state did not <br />share any of the revenue that produced its multi - billion <br />dollar surpluses with California's cities and counties. In <br />fact, even during the best of times, the state continued <br />to take away local government property tax year after <br />year." <br />Woodland Daily Democrat editorial: Denying <br />[VLF] funds which have already been taken by the state <br />will make it almost impossible for local governments to <br />provide services demanded by the public. <br />Lassen County News article about VLF – <br />Susanville City Manager Newell Sorensen was <br />quoted in this piece: "Back when the state had lots of <br />money, they decided to cut taxes, not one providing <br />revenue to the state but one providing revenue to cities <br />and counties. They got all the credit for it and some- <br />body else got all the negative benefit." <br />The Tahoe Daily Tribune –South Lake Tahoe <br />City Manager David Jinkens: "'We're responsible for <br />providing basic services. We do the real things that <br />affect real people. This is our bread and butter,' Jinkens <br />said, listing snow removal as well as police and fire as <br />other services supported through the $21 million general <br />fund." <br />The Amador Ledger- Dispatch [Governor] Davis' <br />proposed changes to the VLF, made public January 10, <br />would impact the city of Jackson to the tune of <br />$160,000 annually. Paid into the city's general fund, the <br />funding is equivalent to two police officer positions or <br />two years of street paving projects. <br />BUDGET UPDATE <br />The Administration is reportedly exploring <br />whether the vehicle license fee (VLF) can <br />be increased administratively, using <br />existing law – without any elected official <br />having to "pull the trigger". Finance <br />Director Steve Peace and State Controller <br />Steve Westly are looking for a way to <br />achieve "automatic" restoration of the fees, <br />that would also withstand legal challenges. <br />If the fees could be increased, Assembly <br />Democrats would reportedly move forward <br />the $3.3 billion in cuts already approved <br />for the current fiscal year, but currently <br />conjoined to AB 4X (VLF Trigger bill) – <br />about a third of what the Governor re- <br />quested, but better than no action at all. <br />• The Senate may vote Monday on spending <br />cuts – possibly the same package of cuts <br />previously approved. The Assembly may <br />act on cuts next Thursday. <br />The Los Angeles Times reported today <br />that a group of "at least five Republicans <br />and six Democrats in the state Assembly <br />have crossed party lines and joined forces <br />to call for an immediate, comprehensive <br />review of state government ", looking for a <br />way to solve the state's budget problems <br />by June 15. (See "Bipartisan Assembly <br />Group Tackles State Budget Crisis ", at <br />www.lafimes.com.) <br />Visit the League's Official Web Site -- www.cacities.org PRIORITY FOCUS /PAGE 7 <br />