My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
CC Min 2003-02-03 Reg
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2003
>
CC Min 2003-02-03 Reg
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/6/2011 2:58:29 PM
Creation date
3/6/2003 2:42:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
2/3/2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
M/S Howard /Pierce to approve the City Manager's initial recommendation to direct <br />City Departments to identify savings equal to at least 1/3 ($1.2 million) of the <br />projected 2002/2003 deficit of $3.5 million and draw down our reserves by the <br />remaining 2/3 ($2.3 million). Approve the suggested calendar for future meetings <br />and decisions to work on the short-term and long -term solutions to our deficit <br />problem. <br />The motion passed by a unanimous voice vote. MINUTE ORDER 03 -27 <br />9. MATTERS OF COUNCIL INTEREST - <br />9.A. Legislation (information only) - This sub - section involves possible discussion of <br />City Position on Proposed Legislation Described in the League of California Cities <br />Priority Focus Bulletin No. 3 -2003. Council may direct staff to act on positions taken <br />by Council. (Copies of League of California Cities Priority Focus available in City <br />Clerk's Department). <br />9.A.1 — Council Member Howard — requested staff examine the "Utility Users Tax <br />Task Force Update ", page 3 of Priority Focus #3, dated January 24, 2003. Director of <br />Finance and Financial Planning Ponty stated that the City is following and involved in <br />this subject. <br />9.B. Proposed City Council Policy on Recycled Water: (205) <br />Council Member Jordan stated she did not want to discuss whether recycled water is <br />V safe because many studies are being done, there are reasonable differences and <br />opinions as to the uses, and there will be ongoing debates in the future. She further <br />stated that her proposal is to request Council implement a policy to not force one <br />segment of the Redwood City population to carry the burden of a potential drought by <br />forcing them to use recycled water near their homes, near their children or pets. <br />Council Member Jordan continued to explain her five reasons for the policy. She <br />stated that even if we were told that it is absolutely safe by the State or by the Federal <br />Government, there is still a chance that they could be wrong. Stating that the primary <br />goal of the contingency plan is to share hardship equitability among all user classes, <br />Ms. Jordan stated that the concept of forcing Homeowner associations to use recycled <br />water is making that particular population disproportionately carry the burden of the <br />potential drought. Devaluation of property could be an issue disclosed upon sale of <br />property that could be viewed as inferior. Her final point was to allow buyers in new <br />developments the choice of whether to buy or rent in an area where recycled water is <br />being used. <br />Council Members asked questions and made various comments. <br />REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING FEBRUARY 3, E <br />PAGGE 5 <br />5 <br />MINUTES <br />MINUTES Book No. 59 <br />Page No. 376 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.