My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
CC Min 2003-02-10 Reg
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2003
>
CC Min 2003-02-10 Reg
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/6/2011 2:58:33 PM
Creation date
3/6/2003 2:45:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
2/10/2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
INTRODUCE AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTIONS 20.95.1.C, 20.95.2.6, <br />20.127 AND 20.190 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF THE CITY OF REDWOOD <br />CITY, RELATING TO MAXIMUM PARKING PERIODS AND METER RATES ON <br />VARIOUS PUBLIC STREETS AND PENALTIES AND BAIL SCHEDULES <br />PERTAINING THERETO; <br />Council Member Ruskin explained that while in the past he has opposed <br />this approval; his vote in favor of this ordinance at this time is due to the <br />dramatic worsening of the economic condition leaving no choice in the <br />matter. MINUTE ORDER 03 -33 <br />B. ADOPTIONS (second reading) <br />i) Ordinance on Traffic Impact Fees, amendment of ordinance; (301) <br />ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE 2243 AMENDING ARTICLE XV, SECTION 18.253 <br />TO CHAPTER 18 OF THE CODE OF THE CITY OF REDWOOD CITY <br />RELATING TO EXEMPTIONS AND CREDITS TO THE TRANSPORTATION <br />IMPACT FEES FOR USES EXCEPT PROFESSIONAL, MEDICAL, BUSINESS <br />AND ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE USES WITHIN A CERTAIN DEFINED <br />DOWNTOWN AREA (first reading on 1/27/03); <br />7.1 Section — Motions (continued) — Removed from Consent Calendar (304) <br />B. M/S Ruskin /Howard to approve and authorize execution of an agreement <br />with Winzler & Kelly Consulting Engineers of San Francisco, California, for <br />providing consultant services for the Preliminary Design of the Bayfront <br />Canal Improvement Project, in an amount not to exceed $210,062.00. <br />Council Member Ruskin stated that both this item and item 7.1.0 did not <br />provide enough information for him to vote for approval. The <br />recommendation stated the company and amount of the contract in each <br />case, but not a clearly stated reason for choosing that particular company. <br />He stated that there were no figures of comparison provided. <br />Senior Civil Engineer Chang explained that when selecting a consultant service for <br />professional engineering, depending on the specialty of the project, 4 -6 companies <br />are invited to submit proposals. The scope of work required is identified in the <br />Request for Proposals process and the proposals submitted detail the company's <br />approach to the project and the amount of staff hours to be used. The fee <br />schedule of each company is available to staff when evaluating the proposals and <br />at that time 3 -4 companies are chosen to be interviewed. After the interviews, the <br />ranking of first, second and third are given to the top three most qualified <br />companies. The first ranked company submits a detailed proposal of the scope of <br />work and fee schedule. After detailed review, staff then negotiates costs and if <br />agreement is reached with the first ranked there is no further negotiation with the <br />REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING FEBRUARY 10, 2003 <br />MINUTES PAGE 6 <br />MINUTES Book No. 59 <br />Page No. 387 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.