My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2003-03-10
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2003
>
AgdaPkt 2003-03-10
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/2/2011 2:44:07 PM
Creation date
3/6/2003 5:04:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Agency Type
City Council
Date
3/10/2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
128
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
developers of the project, for the Amended and Restated Disposition and <br />Development Agreement for the Downtown Retail- Cinema and Public Parking <br />Project and authorize the City Manager and the Redevelopment Agency Executive <br />Director to execute same. <br />The motion passed by a majority roll call with Council Member /Board Member <br />Jordan voting no and Vice MayorlVice Chair Ira abstaining. MINUTE ORDER 03-46 <br />RD MINUTE ORDER 03 -06 <br />B. Hearing and Adoption of Resolutions of Necessity for Initiation of Eminent <br />Domain Proceedings for the Downtown Underground Public Parking Garage <br />and Retail- Cinema Project. (CITY COUNCIL ONLY) <br />Economic Development Coordinator Webb explained the initiation of the eminent <br />domain proceedings and that the acquisition is for the underground parking facility <br />in the downtown area. Action tonight would allow the project to keep moving <br />forward in a timely fashion. <br />Herman Fitzgerald stated the four issues before Council in considering adoption of <br />condemnation proceedings in six separate resolutions. He stated the findings that <br />must be made. He stated the City has the legal authority, the resolutions, and the <br />negotiations will continue. <br />_. Public Comment: <br />Mario Martins, owner of a business in the center of the proposed project, stated he <br />was promised that eminent domain would be the last resort considered. He further <br />stated that the process has not been fair and during the past fours years the <br />property and business owners have not been consulted. He asked that the Council <br />be compassionate and show fairness. <br />Ted Hannig stated he was speaking on behalf of over six owners and owns <br />properties at 860 and 878 Jefferson. Mr. Hannig stated for the record that the <br />entity that made offers to the owners is not the entity holding the hearings at this <br />time. He urged Council to study whether there is a level playing field for those <br />owners in the community when offers are being made at half value. Mr. Hannig <br />stated that on February 4 he wrote to the City advising all future correspondence <br />be sent to him on behalf of the property owners and on February 5, the request <br />was made for the remaining property owners. He further stated that at no time was <br />an offer received by him. <br />Robert Baldwin stated his excitement in the project and that if your property is <br />involved in eminent domain proceedings it is a concern. He further stated that if the <br />developer is receiving a good deal, that the affected owners then should be given <br />the same fair compensation. <br />Council Members asked various questions. <br />JOINT CITY COUNCIL/REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING FEBRUARY 24, 2003 <br />MINUTES PAGE <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.