Laserfiche WebLink
�5-A-19 <br />Legislative Bill Action <br />................................ ............................... <br />issuance of $10 billion in general obligation bonds <br />to finance a broad variety of local infrastructure <br />and economic development projects. The act <br />would be administered by the California infrastruc- <br />ture and Economic Development Bank. Funds <br />may be awarded to local governments through a <br />combination of grants and/or loans, with additional <br />priorities to projects which support specified <br />"smart growth" criteria: consistent with regional <br />jobs/housing priorities, support increased residen- <br />tial density developments, support transit oriented <br />development, and identified quality of life improve- <br />ments. Matching grants are required, but this <br />requirement may be reduced or waived in cases <br />where the project would achieve more than one of <br />the identified priorities, or the local government <br />can demonstrate significant hardship in generating <br />a local match. Staff: Dan Carrigg, Status: Intro- <br />duced, not yet assigned to committee, Position: <br />Support. <br />ACA 11 (Levine); SCA 11 (Alarcon). Local <br />Bonds Infrastructure Projects. These mea- <br />sures propose reduced voter thresholds for local <br />infrastructure projects, but in different ways. ACA <br />11 (not to be confused with last year's measure <br />approved by the Legislature for the March, 2004, <br />state ballot which would designate up to 3 percent <br />of state funds for state and local infrastructure <br />projects) authorizes the issuance of local general <br />obligation bonds for a broad range of infrastructure <br />projects with a majority vote. It also reduces the <br />threshold for school bonds for repairing or replac- <br />ing structurally unsafe schools from 55 percent to <br />a majority. SCA 11 authorizes a local government <br />to issue an infrastructure bond with a majority vote <br />if the bond allocates at least 25 percent of the <br />bond for affordable housing, 25 percent for trans- <br />portation, 25 percent for open space, and the <br />balance for general infrastructure needs. <br />Existing League policy supports reduced local <br />voter thresholds which would allow a simple <br />majority of voters to establish local priorities, <br />including the right to raise taxes or issue general <br />obligation bonds. These measures will be re- <br />viewed at the upcoming meeting of the League's <br />Housing, Community, and Economic Development <br />Committee, and amendments may be suggested <br />to make them more flexible. Staff: Dan Carrigg, <br />Status: Introduced, not yet assigned to commit- <br />tee, Position: Support in Concept Pending <br />Review <br />SB 115 (Torlakson). Zoning Disclosure. <br />Residential Purchases. Requires developers of <br />subdivisions, sellers of condominiums, and sellers <br />of all other residential real property to disclose to <br />the purchaser the residential zoning, including <br />permitted housing densities, of all land within one - <br />quarter mile of the boundary line of the affected <br />property. <br />Existing League policy on zoning supports a <br />process that is open and fair to the public. SB 115 <br />will promote that concept by ensuring that—in the <br />excitement and confusion of purchasing a new <br />home — prospective buyers are made aware of the <br />surrounding zoning, including the permitted hous- <br />ing densities on surrounding properties. <br />Legislation attempting to curb community <br />opposition issues has been prevalent in recent <br />years. Too often these approaches focus on the <br />"back end" of the problem by attempting to limit <br />opportunities for public discussion, curtail local <br />land use authority and discretion, or shift land use <br />decision - making to the state. SB 115 however, <br />takes a pro - active approach to this issue and <br />focuses on the "front end" by ensuring that new <br />home purchasers are made aware of surrounding <br />zoning issues as they make the critical decision <br />whether or not to purchase a home. Staff: Dan <br />Carrigg, Status: SenJud; Hrg -3/18, Position: <br />Support. <br />SB 465 (Soto). Transit Oriented Develop- <br />ment. Financing. Sponsored by the Gateway <br />Cities Council of Governments (Los Angeles <br />County), this measure is intended to provide <br />funding to facilitate the development of land within <br />an adopted transit village plan area pursuant to the <br />Transit Village Development Planning Act of 1994. <br />This measure permits cities and counties to adopt <br />PAGE 10/PRIORITY FOCUS Visit the League's Official Web Site -- www.cacities.org <br />