My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
CC Min 2003-03-03 Stdy
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2003
>
CC Min 2003-03-03 Stdy
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/6/2011 2:58:39 PM
Creation date
4/1/2003 8:35:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council
Date
3/3/2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Engineering, Inc. (304) MINUTE ORDER 03-49 <br />7.2 Section - Claims and Warrants <br />A. Approve warrants dated through March 3, 2003 and usual and necessary <br />payments through March 10, 2003; (301) MINUTE ORDER 03 -50 <br />8. MATTERS OF COUNCIL INTEREST — <br />8. A. Legislation (information only) - This sub - section involves possible discussion <br />of City Position on Proposed Legislation Described in the League of California Cities <br />Priority Focus Bulletin No. 7 -2003. Council may direct staff to act on positions taken <br />by Council. (Copies of League of California Cities Priority Focus available in City <br />Clerk's Department). <br />8. B. Council Member Pierce — thanked everyone for participating in the Education <br />Foundation event on February 28, 2003. <br />7:30 p.m. - Vice Mayor Ira left the dais due to a conflict of interest <br />Joint Study Session with Planning Commission & Architectural Review Committee <br />9. STUDY SESSION: <br />-- Joint Study Session to Review Concept Plans for Retail /Cinema Project <br />Redevelopment Manager Moeller explained the background stating that once <br />comments are received by the designers, plans to move forward and finalized <br />conceptual plans will then be brought forward to the permit process. Those would go <br />back to the ARC for input, PC would review for planned development and come back <br />to the Council for final approval of the design of the project. <br />Allison Kendall of Friedman, Tung and Bottomley, working with the design team from <br />Field -Paoli on the concepts, stated that this would be an "in progress" review and that <br />the process would continue for several weeks before a formal application is <br />submitted. <br />Rob Anderson of Field -Paoli stated that he has been gave an overview of the project. <br />Conceptual plans showing various architectural details on each side of the building <br />were presented. <br />Michael Friedman asked for comments. <br />REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING & JOINT STUDY SESSION WITH MARCH 3, 2 003 <br />PLANNING COMMISSION & ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE PAGE 3 <br />MINUTES <br />MINUTES Book No. 59 <br />Page No. 405 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.