My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2010-10-25
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2010
>
AgdaPkt 2010-10-25
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/9/2012 12:24:02 PM
Creation date
10/21/2010 6:19:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Redevelopment Agency
Date
10/25/2010
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
204
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
7.B <br /> ' Page 6 <br /> ALTERNATIVES <br /> • Provide alternative direction <br /> • Terminate the contract prior to the end of its full term in the event that state statutes <br /> are amended to prohibit or substantially change the operation of photo red light <br /> systems or state courts publish decisions that have the effect of rendering photo <br /> red light evidence inadmissible. <br /> FISCAL IMPACT <br /> When originally implemented, the program was represented to be financially self-sufficient <br /> and the City anticipated that the system would pay for itself with revenue generated from <br /> fines collected. Each citation carries a state mandated fine of $446.00, approximately 34% <br /> of which is earmarked for Redwood City. There have been, and cvntinue to be, some <br /> difficulties with collecting the City's portion of the fees from the county, though this appears <br /> to be 'rmproving. Addi�ionally, even for fees which the City successfully collects, there is a <br /> delay of several months and the entire fine is not always collected due to reductions by the <br /> court and other factors outside the City's control. <br /> As would be expected, there was a period of time after each approach went operational <br /> � when expenditures were higher than the revenue generated, primarily due to the defay in <br /> collecting fines, but as of now the program is self-funding. <br /> Year Gross Revenue Expenditures Net <br /> Revenue/ Loss <br /> � '07-`08 $18,086 $59,25v $41,149 <br /> '08--`09 $86,142 $120,397 $34,255 <br /> '�9-` 10 $369,480 $187, 352 $182,128 <br /> Total To Date $473,708 $367,004 $1 �6,704 <br /> As this chart demonstrates, the Redflex enforcement program lost money the first two <br /> years and became self-sufficient in the third year. The program has presently recouped all <br /> of its previous losses and generated $'106,704 in total additional revenue. The revenue <br /> increase can be attributed to: 1) the collection of fines from the county has become more <br /> consistent; and 2) both approaches were operational for the entire fiscal '09-'10 year. For <br /> the previous two fiscal years only the eastbound Whipple approach was operational, and <br /> for only four months of fiscal year '2007-08. Based on the average revenues and <br /> expenditures for both approaches over the previous six month period, the projected net <br /> revenue for fiscal year 2010-'11 would be approximately �325,000. If the City allows the <br /> Redflex program to run for the remaining length of the contract, and presuming the number <br /> of violations cited and fines collected remains static, the program should generate <br /> approximately $325,00� in net revenue in each of the next two fiscal years and $217,000 <br /> of net revenue in the final partial fiscal year (through March 2013). <br /> Should the City terminate the contract due changes in state law or published court <br /> , decisions which impact the viability of photo red light enforcement systems there is no <br /> early termination pena[ty per the terms of the contract. <br /> 6 <br /> � <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.