Laserfiche WebLink
6.1 F <br /> Page 7 <br /> Duri this same time eriod the District Attorney's activities did not show any notable variance I <br /> ng p , <br /> in the number of cltild molestexs prosecuted as shown in Chart 2 below: <br /> Chart 2 <br /> Cases �iled By San il�atea County <br /> ��� T�la�� �hild ��u�l �busc� ���s �il� by �� <br /> tvuchinga ch�ld under �.� �rith �e�rd/�a�sc+vidus intent <br /> a PC2g8(aj veitfiout fc�rce r= PCZ88tl�j �th f�rce <br /> � <br /> , - �; -�� <br /> � <br /> _. - ,,, <br /> � � � III <br /> �3 � '� <br /> r <br /> � <br /> :�. - _ _ -._.. <br /> _ <br /> 2ooa - _._.,_ �� ; �-.-�, <br /> 200'S � ' <br /> 2tltf7 � <br /> 20a9 ' <br /> ' ' ' ice 'I <br /> Source: San Mateo Couaty Disinct Attorney s Off <br /> . B. Use of the Internet by Segual Predators ' <br /> Nationally, I <br /> 0 34% o� internet users in the 5` to 12` grade have received unwanted sexual�y explicit <br /> material via tl�e intexnet. 13% laave received a sexual solicitation while online. 13 <br /> 0 14°/a of teens have actual�y met a person face�to-face that they ave oniy `spoken to' over ' <br /> the Internet (9% of 13-15 year olds; 22%a of 16-17 year olds). <br /> a�,ess than 0.3% will report these incidents to a xesponsible adult or Iaw �nforcement. <br /> e 1 in 6 investigations of child pornography possession being charged as child molesters in <br /> 2000 and 2006.13 �' <br /> 13 The Nqtional Juvenile Online Yictimizuttan Study, Z000 & ZOU6. Crimes against Childzen Research Center, <br /> Jams Wolak, Davxd Fialcelhor & Kimberly J. Mitc,hell, <br /> :/1 u .edulacrc/'inteznet-crimes/ a ers.html <br /> b Teen Internet Safety Survey. National Cenber for Missing & Exploited Children and Cox Cammunications, 2005. <br /> ���//www netsmartz.orpJsaferil�tatistics.hdn <br /> 4 <br /> � <br /> � <br />