My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2003-04-14
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2003
>
AgdaPkt 2003-04-14
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/2/2011 2:33:19 PM
Creation date
4/10/2003 11:58:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Agency Type
City Council
Date
4/14/2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
165
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
BA-I� <br />MEMORANDUM <br />Date: 3/31103 <br />From: Yann Taylor <br />Re: Watry Proposal <br />Fmject On Broadway <br />Pmject No.: 9916.10 <br />z David Irmer <br />To: Bruce Liedstrand <br />Message: <br />Dear Bruce <br />I am writing this memo in response to Nick Watry's presentation of an alternative proposal for the layout <br />of the underground parking structure for the On Broadway Retail and Entertainment project. His proposal <br />differs from our own in three significant ways: <br />1. Mr. Watry's proposal looks at accommodating the required number of spaces on one, rather <br />than two subsurface levels. <br />2. His proposal relocates the vehicular entrance to the WinslowTheatre Way/Middlefield <br />intersection. <br />3. His proposal involves using along- span" rather than a conventional structural layout. <br />At first glance, his proposal looks like it makes sense from a cost point -of view: the water table is shallow, <br />therefore less excavation could mean reduced waterproofing costs, and a long -span structure is more <br />efficient than a conventional structure in terms of accommodating a larger number of spaces in a given <br />area. <br />The following issues however would need to be carefully considered before proceeding with a revision of <br />the design along the lines of Mr. Watry's proposal: <br />1. Total number of spaces: The proposed layout provides 501 spaces, which is about 80 spaces <br />short of what we agreed to provide in the project in order to obtain Century Theatre's <br />commitment. Mr. Watry mentioned the possibility of including an additional 40 on -grade spaces <br />along Jefferson street (presumably 20 on each side of the street), but we have to date not <br />counted Jefferson on- street parking spaces as part of the required amount for the project, and <br />therefore these spaces should not be included in the total. The possibility of not extending the <br />parking under Broadway was also discussed, in order to avoid having to relocate the utilities <br />there: this would result in the loss of another 60 spaces, even less acceptable to Century <br />Theatres. In order to achieve the required amount of space the below -grade structure would <br />have to be extended under Jefferson, at significant cost due to required utility relocation. <br />2. Long Span Structure — lack of stiffnes: One of the characteristics of long -span parking is a <br />relative lack of stiffness, and the possibility that the structure may transmit vibrations into the <br />movie theaters. This would potentially impact the'THr. rating that Century is trying to achieve. <br />Horton Plaza in San Diego does have a theater built above a long -span deck, and problems <br />associated with vehicle- generated vibrations have been an issue there ever since the Droiect <br />1 U4o bansome St. <br />Suite 206 <br />San Francisco <br />California 94111 <br />Tel. 415.788.6606 <br />Fax 415.788.6650 <br />www.fieldpaoli.com <br />.wen.u.u..Vn.e..mmy++QMay.r. '�mYewma.".mnn.r.� <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.