My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2003-04-28
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2003
>
AgdaPkt 2003-04-28
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/2/2011 2:31:06 PM
Creation date
4/24/2003 4:02:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Agency Type
City Council
Date
4/28/2003
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
213
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
q.A -8 <br />'Another is the attitude of bankers and bond <br />rating houses, which have already dropped the <br />state's credit standing to an embarrassingly low <br />level, among the lowest of any state... effectively <br />treating the state like a Third World nation that has <br />not managed its affairs very responsibly — which is <br />not an unjustified attitude." <br />Orange County Register 4/3/03, And now, <br />the local Income tax — The latest bad idea <br />from the big spenders In Sacramento is a <br />doozy <br />"Now the Legislature is considering AB 1690. It <br />would authorize any city or county to form a "fire <br />protection finance agency" for the purpose of <br />funding fire protection services or capital improve- <br />ments. To fund this agency, it would authorize - for <br />the first time in state history - cities and counties to <br />levy a "local general income tax. <br />"The proposed income tax for fire suppression <br />is a special tax because the money would go to fire <br />services, right? Not according to the legislation. <br />The money from the new income tax would go into <br />the city's or county's general fund for general <br />purposes. The Fire Protection Finance Agency, on <br />the other hand, would receive an increased portion <br />of the property tax. The only reason the statute is <br />structured this way is to avoid the two- thirds vote <br />for special taxes." <br />The Sacramento Bee 4/9/03, Dan Walters: <br />Legislature occupies itself with trivia as state <br />meltdown looms. "Hundreds of lobbyists repre- <br />senting thousands of special interests swarm over <br />the Capitol, trying to pass or kill bills that may be <br />important to them, but have little or no effect on the <br />larger public. And collectively, they consume most <br />of the time and attention of lawmakers and their <br />staffs while big issues go begging... it's utterly <br />bizarre that the Legislature should be conducting <br />business as usual when it faces a budget deficit <br />that Gov. Gray Davis pegs at $35 billion, when Wall <br />Street is downgrading the state's credit rating to <br />near -junk bond status, and when the education of <br />millions of kids, the health of millions of poor people <br />and other matters of real substance hang in the <br />balance." <br />State budget crunch — Leaning too much on <br />taxes could drive businesses away. 'States <br />battle each other for companies and business. <br />Despite the basic strong fundamentals that Califor- <br />nia enjoys, we have committed some key turnovers <br />that leave the state vulnerable to a business <br />exodus. The state's disastrous handling of the <br />electricity crisis two years ago was a mistake that <br />already has changed our positive momentum. <br />Increasing taxes or fees too much could take <br />California out of the game for business." <br />.. ........ . . . . . . . . . . . . <br />LEAGUE GRASSROOTS IN ACTION <br />An occasional report on Grassroots activities by <br />League divisions ( outside of work specifically on <br />the state budget crisis, which is highlighted in the <br />LOCAL Update aa". <br />Members from the League's Peninsula Divi- <br />sion, Mayor Kris Casto (Los Altos), Council <br />Members Dave Bauer (Belmont), Curtis Wright <br />(Monte Sereno) and Lee Panza <br />(Brisbane), testified before the Assembly's Local <br />Government Committee in support of AS 980 <br />(Salinas), and in opposition of AB 1160 <br />(Steinberg). <br />"The presence of these local officials made a <br />difference on both bills," said League lobbyist Dan <br />Carrigg. "There is nothing like having a few council <br />members from a legislator's district to focus their <br />attention." <br />AB 980 is a League- sponsored bill that would <br />allow cities to certify their housing elements in their <br />general plans on the basis of housing actually <br />produced. The bill moved out of the committee on <br />a unanimous vote. <br />AS 1160 was more controversial, but ultimately <br />passed out of committee on a 4 -3 vote. Regional <br />Representative Rebecca Elliot reports that the <br />elected officials, members of the Division's newly <br />formed Legislative Response Team, are ready to <br />return to Sacramento for the next round of testi- <br />mony on these bills in the Assembly Housing and <br />Community Development Committee. <br />PAGE &PRIORITY FOCUS Visit the League's Official Web Site -"www.cacnies.org <br />QUOTESfrom page 5 ............................................... <br />the deficit would vanish. The San Bernardino County Sun 04109/03 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.