My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2003-06-02
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2003
>
AgdaPkt 2003-06-02
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/2/2011 2:49:23 PM
Creation date
5/29/2003 3:16:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Agency Type
City Council
Date
6/2/2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
144
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Christina Lai submitted for public record of May 12, 2003 and requested Vice <br />Mayor Ira to place in the record of written comments on the addendum, a copy of <br />the front page of The Pilot dated May 2003. She further stated that the Redwood <br />Shores Community Association (RSCA), on April 17, passed a resolution <br />supporting the February 3 policy of making recycled water non - mandatory for <br />existing homeowners associations. <br />Ray Wang stated his belief that it is important in the negative declaration and <br />CEQA discussions to address questions from the September meeting which were <br />not health related as well as the health related questions. His second point was <br />that given the fact that the recycled water project is such a large project, he asked <br />why we are not doing a full EIR. He stated that since there are so many projects <br />dependent on this project, that a full EIR might make more sense than a negative <br />declaration. His final comment involved including the toilet project with the recycled <br />water resolution. <br />Council Member Jordan asked that the addendum be circulated for an additional <br />timeframe, possibly until the end of the week of June 9. <br />City Attorney Yamamoto stated that there is no statutory requirement that the <br />addendum be circulated at all, but because the Council is considering an open <br />comment period it lends the discretion to determine the length of time in which <br />comments may be submitted. City Attorney Yamamoto suggested from a <br />conservative standpoint, that whatever comment period is set, Council should <br />have certainty that those comments have been received and that Council is <br />assured the comment period was open long enough for reasonable opportunity for <br />people to participate, submit comments, questions or evidence as they choose. <br />The fact of the matter being that those responses will have been received by the <br />City, we will know it because it will occur either on a date certain prior to a Council <br />meeting and as a part of the agenda packet or members of public will have the <br />opportunity to participate in the process up to the time that the meeting is closed <br />on this particular item. <br />M/S Hartnett/Ira to: <br />1. Receive the Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) Addendum document from <br />staff <br />2. Direct staff to circulate the Addendum for a 28 -day public comment period <br />(May 13 through June 9, 2003) <br />The motion passed by a unanimous voice vote by those present. <br />MINUTE ORDER 03 -105 <br />Recess: 9:00 -9:15 p.m. <br />B. Investigating the Possibility of Reopening Access to Redwood Shores <br />Levees <br />REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />MINUTES May 12, 2001 <br />PAGE 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.