Laserfiche WebLink
�44 <br />BUDGETfrom page 1 ................. ............................... <br />With this urgency, over the last week there have <br />been a number of high -level discussions of options, <br />and more discussions are expected in the next <br />week. In these discussions, several issues have <br />emerged that ultimately could have an impact on <br />cities. First, previous budget proposals and discus- <br />sions raised the possibility of a local government cut <br />in the $500 million range. This figure first emerged in <br />the Senate Republican Budget proposal in February, <br />and was referenced more recently in a number of <br />Assembly offices. We understand that, as the two <br />parties remain split on the subject of new taxes <br />versus deeper budget cuts, higher figures are being <br />discussed as well, and special districts could be <br />included. <br />direction in the budget negotiations, but major parts <br />of the debate appear more focused. We are clearly <br />entering what can be expected to be a very active <br />and critical two weeks in the budget negotiations. <br />City officials should remain on HIGH ALERT as we <br />enter the next two weeks. <br />DON'T MISS THE JUNE ISSUE OF <br />WESTERN CITY MAGAZINE: ETHICAL <br />DECISION - MAKING AND CONTROL <br />OF LOCAL REVENUE <br />Permanent Cuts Untenable <br />Second, and perhaps more disturbing than the <br />proposed cut level, is possible consideration that any <br />cuts to local government could be permanent <br />cutslll The state budget deficit is a multi-year prob- <br />lem, but it does not require a permanent hit to local <br />government. Local government is more than willing <br />to cooperate with the state as it works its way out of <br />this deficit over a period of time and as the economy <br />stabilizes, but nothing in this scenario requires a <br />permanent reduction of local govemment revenues. <br />A permanent cut would be ERAF all over again. A <br />bottom line in the League's message to legisla- <br />tors: NO PERMANENT CUTSM <br />Support Grows for Constitutional Protection <br />Proposal <br />The good news that emerged this week is that <br />legislative leadership is seriously considering a <br />constitutional protection measure that will go on the <br />ballot to prevent the state from taking money from <br />local government in the future to solve its fiscal <br />problems. The measure is being proposed as part of <br />the budget solution and could go on the ballot as <br />early as March of 2004. There are many details still <br />to be worked out with this proposal and with the <br />budget in general, but the idea of constitutional <br />protection for local revenues it is a serious part of the <br />discussions. <br />What does all this mean? There still is no clear <br />e The Importance Of Using Principles, Not <br />Just Rules, To Guide Ethical Decision - <br />Making — by League President John Russo <br />• The Municipal Information Systems <br />Association Of California (MISAC) Offers <br />Help, Resources and Ideas For Cities <br />• Calling All First Responders: Making <br />Connections for Security in Southern Califor- <br />nia <br />• Ontario Tries An Innovative Approach To <br />In- The -Field Data Entry and Retrieval <br />• The Origin & Devolution Of Local Rev- <br />enue Authority <br />Plus — Tough Questions and Tight Spots <br />Everyday Ethics for Local Officials <br />Plus— Finance Series: Look Before You <br />Leap: Ethical Hurdles of the State Budget <br />Crunch <br />All this, plus information on city jobs and <br />businesses that provide services to cities. <br />For over 75 years, the League's award - <br />winning Western City magazine has been the <br />best source of information for California city <br />decision makers. For subscription information <br />call: 916.658.8223, or visit the Western City Web <br />site at www.westemcity.00m. <br />PAGE 4 /PRIORITY FOCUS Visit the League's Official Web Site-- www.cacities.org <br />