Laserfiche WebLink
8.A <br /> Page 8 <br /> deck, such as wood decking and painted steel mesh railing are considered <br /> consistent with the design aesthetic of the proposed residence. <br /> In addition to the above and nofinrithstanding that "privacy" is not a factor or standard <br /> subject to the Zoning Administrator's consideration, it is worth noting that the application <br /> for the proposed project does include a screen wall on the eastern portion of the rear <br /> deck. The appellants have suggested the construction of a two tiered deck, with the <br /> deck terracing down with the slope of the property. The suggestion has been provided <br /> to the applicant for consideration; however, the applicant has not expressed any interest <br /> in a multi-level deck. <br /> Please refer to the Staff Responses to the Offer of Proof (Attachment 11) for further <br /> discussion on this issue. <br /> ALTERNATIVES <br /> Uphold the appeal and require revisions to the proposed design of the single-family <br /> residence. <br /> Deny the appeal and modify the Zoning Administrator's decision through revisions to <br /> conditions of approval referenced in the Notice of Official Action. <br /> FISCAL IMPACT <br /> Fiscal impact of this decision should be negligible. <br /> � ``�` � G� <br /> B e Lyon Jill as <br /> enior Planner Di tor of Planning, Housing, and <br /> Economic Development <br /> ...- <br /> J <br /> R bert B. Bell <br /> Interim City Manager <br />