My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2010-11-22 clsd and regular
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2010
>
AgdaPkt 2010-11-22 clsd and regular
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/9/2012 11:22:57 AM
Creation date
11/18/2010 5:05:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council and Redevelopment Agency
Date
11/22/2010
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
418
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
8.A <br /> Page 79 <br /> neighhorhood, while still permitting Applicants to have the ecnnamic, sufety, and <br /> environmental benefits of a metal roof. <br /> b. In makirrg this truly nrinor modification with respect to Applicants' desired interior <br /> space, the benefits to the Appellants — who would lvvk directly look into the large <br /> (appr•oximately. SS' long by at least 10' high), unbroken, impv.sing surface qfApplicants' <br /> Roof frvm the kitchen, bathroom, and second bedroom/��ce, and from two decks — <br /> would far ounveigh any aesthetic compromise the .4pplicants wnuld make. <br /> Staff Response: The appellant communicated the above design options to the <br /> applicant during the course of the City's design review process, including neighborhood <br /> meetings. The applicant chose to pursue the design as submitted. Consequently, the <br /> Zoning Administrator evaluated the proposed design and found it to be consistent with <br /> the requirements of the Redwood City Zoning Ordinance. <br /> Conclusions ofFact and Luw that Apt�ellants would have Demonstrated The Planning <br /> Department_failed in its duty (a) to follow the Guidelines, and (b) to balance the desire qf the <br /> property owner with the rights, needs, and interests of the adjoining and nearby property <br /> owners, �f the neighborhood, and of adl residents qf Redwood Ciry by unreasonably authorizing <br /> the construction of a quarter-round standing seam metal ro�f that is discordant with the <br /> neighborhood's don:inant roofstyles, thereby degrading a valuable element of'the streetscape <br /> and the neighborhood. <br /> Staff Response: The Planning Department has not failed in its duty to follaw the <br /> Redwood City Zoning Ordinance or the Redwood City Municipal Code, and has issued <br /> this architectural permit in compliance with the requirements of the Article 45 of the <br /> Redwood City Zoning Ordinance in that consideration was given to the architectural <br /> design, streetscape, and neighborhood context based on the Architectural Standards <br /> set forth in Section 45.8. <br /> 11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.