My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2010-11-22 clsd and regular
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2010
>
AgdaPkt 2010-11-22 clsd and regular
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/9/2012 11:22:57 AM
Creation date
11/18/2010 5:05:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council and Redevelopment Agency
Date
11/22/2010
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
418
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
1 1 L✓1 L,( G�t, O' 1��j ' I U <br /> � ` � ATTIkCNI�E�� -3 <br /> Planning, Housing and Economic Planning (650) 780-7234 <br /> Development Department Housing and Economic Development (650) 780-7290 <br /> PO Box 3911 field Road ����� DD (65 ) 780-0129 <br /> Redwood City, CA 94063 �(� http:/lwww.redwoodciry.orc <br /> � FNlplil �11 <br /> August 17, 2010 <br /> Robert Carroli <br /> 448 Saint Francis Street <br /> Redwood City, CA 94062 <br /> Subject: Archite�tural Permit for a Single Family Residence <br /> Project No.: AP 2010-09 <br /> Property Addresses: 448 Saint Francis Street <br /> Assessor's Parcel Numbers: 058-153-040 <br /> Dear Mr. Carroll: <br /> This is a fofiow up to your July 27, 2010 submittal of a revised arborist report prepared by <br /> Henry Ardalan. The City's Urban Forestry Specialist has jusf completed a review of the <br /> subject report and has found it to be incomplete. The report does not include the valuation of <br /> all trees on site as previously requested in the Plan Review Committee Summary (PRC) <br /> Letter dated April 16, 2010. In an effort to assist with the submittal of a complete arborist <br /> report, I have enclosed for your information the following guidelines which consist of industry <br /> standards (your report may already contain some of the required information) as follows: <br /> • Date report was written <br /> • Assignment — define clearly what the purpose of the report is; what did the client ask <br /> you to do? <br /> • Background — include any pertinent: background or history to the situation; tree; the <br /> assignment; ordinances, laws or criteria affecting the decision; etc. <br /> • Details of the inspection — date; location of tree (number if invenforied); map o� sketch <br /> if appropriate; specifics about the tree you visited — Genus, species, diameter measure <br /> at height measured, location, condition, and any observations on structure, foliage, <br /> roots, soil, grade, insecfs, disease, etc.; observations about the property and site; use <br /> of area and reported purpose of tree; statements and history from the client; <br /> • Discussion points — Based on the assignment, what infoRnation you considered whife <br /> forming your conclusions or recommendations. Include points that support the <br /> determination you make for a conclusion or recommendation. For example, this <br /> information should not be general such as "Monterey Pines are short lived.° They <br /> Page ] of 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.