My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Agdapkt 2010-12-06 clsd and regular
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2010
>
Agdapkt 2010-12-06 clsd and regular
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/9/2012 10:25:30 AM
Creation date
12/2/2010 3:32:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Redevelopment Agency
Date
12/6/2010
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
386
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
6.3B <br /> Page 12 <br /> - Step lf: Calculate the Base/Seasonal Allocation Cutback Percentage for each <br /> agency by dividing its Base/Seasonal Allocation by the agency's Total <br /> Production, and <br /> - Step 1g: Calculate the Base/Seasonal Purchase Cutback Percentage by <br /> multiplying the Base/Seasonal Allocation Cutback percentage times the lesser of: <br /> (a) the immediately preceding SFPUC purchases or (b) ISG, adjusting the <br /> Seasonal percentage above until the total reduction equals the Overall Average <br /> Wholesale Customer Reduction. <br /> Additionally, adjustments to the Base Component for Stanford University will be made ' <br /> to remove that ttivo week time period that the University is completely closed during , <br /> the winter break per policy set by the University President as long as that policy <br /> remains in place. This adjustment will be removed at such time as the seasonal closure <br /> policy is terminated by Stanford University. <br /> Section 2.2.2 Step Two: First Adjustment for San Tose and Santa Clara. The resulting <br /> Base/Seasonal Purchase Cutback Percentage in Section 2.2.1 for San Jose and Santa <br /> Clara will be compared to the highest Base/Seasonal Purchase Cutback percentage of <br /> I the other Wholesale Customers. If both San Jose's and Santa Clara's percentage <br /> reductions are larger than the highest percentage reduction among any other Wholesale <br /> Customers, the Base/Seasonal Purchase Cutback percentage established under Section <br /> 2.2.1 will remain unchanged. If either San Jose's percentage cutback or Santa Clara's <br /> percentage cutback, or both, is smalIer than the highest Base/Seasonal Purchase <br /> Cutback percentage of other Wholesale Customers, the Base/Seasonal Allocation (in <br /> mgd) of San Jose or Santa Clara, or both, will be reduced so that the percentage cutUack <br /> of each is no smaller than that of the Wholesale Customers' otherwise highest <br /> percentage cutback. The amount of shortage allocation (in mgd) removed from San Jose <br /> and/ or Santa Clara will be reallocated among the remaining Wholesale Customers in <br /> proportion to the Base/Seasonal Allocation of each. <br /> Section 2.2.3 Step Three: Determination of Weighted Purchase Cutback For Each <br /> Wholesale Customer. Each agency's weighted allocation is calculated by multiplying <br /> its Adjusted Base/Seasonal Allocation in Section 2.2.2 by 66.66% and its Fixed <br /> Component by 33.33%. The Fixed Component is (i) the Wholesale Customer's ISG <br /> provided for in the Agreement, or (ii) in the case of Hayward, 25.11 mgd, or (iii) in the <br /> case of San Jose and Santa Clara, consistent with the limit on purchases from SFPUC set <br /> forth in Section 4.05 of the AgreenRent, e. g., 4.5 mgd each. The amount of the Fixed <br /> Component for each Wholesale Customer is shown on Table 1. <br /> Section 2.2.4 Step Four: Second Adjustment for San Tose and Santa Clara. The <br /> resulting Weighted Allocations for San Jose and Santa Clara will be compared to the <br /> highest Weighted Purchase Cutback, shown as a percentage, of the other WhoIesale <br /> Customers. If both San Jose's and Santa Clara's percentage cutback is larger than the <br /> highest percentage cutback among other Wholesale Customers, the Weighted Purchase <br /> Cutbacks established under Section 2.2.3 will remain unchanged. If either San Jose's <br /> -3- a.�boo�.i <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.