Laserfiche WebLink
6.1 B <br /> The Agency's cash and investments decreased 14.2% as the restricted cash of the Agency pay <br /> off the 1997 tax allocation bonds. The Agency's net assets from governmental activities increased 15.7% to <br /> net assets of $(3.339) million in 2010 from net assets of $(3.962) million in 2009. <br /> Changes in Redevelopment Agency's Net Assets (in Millions) <br /> 2010 2009 Variance <br /> Revenues $ $ <br /> General revenues, Transfers and <br /> Contributions: <br /> Tax increments 12.731 12.672 0.466% <br /> Investrnent earnings 0.268 0.439 -38.952% <br /> Other 0.001 0.190 -99.474% <br /> Community development revenue 0.156 100.000% <br /> Transfer from (to) other City funds 0.527 0.017 3200.000% <br /> Total revenues 12.629 13.318 5.173 % <br /> Expenses <br /> Community development 9.685 7.353 31.715% <br /> Interest on long term debt 2.321 2.332 -0.472% <br /> Total expenses 12.006 9.685 23.965% <br /> Change in net assets 0.623 3.633 -82.852% <br /> Net assets - July 1 3.( 962) 7.595 -47.834% <br /> Net assets - June 30 3.339 3.962) 15.724% <br /> Fiscal Year 2010 Governmental Activities <br /> The Agency's fiscal year 2010 revenue came primarily from property tax increments, which amounted to <br /> $12.7 million, a slight increase of $.1 million over the prior year. The decrease in investment earnings <br /> resulted from declining interest rates, and the decrease in cash balance. <br /> Agency expenses of $12 million in fiscal year 2010 were principally for development-related projects <br /> amounting to $1.3 million, the amount of $3.6 million taken by the State of California as the State struggled <br /> to balance its budget, and school disirict and special district Pass-throughs expense of $1.618 million. The <br /> Agency has agreements with the pre-existing school and special districts in its project area under which it <br /> passes through a portion of the property tax increments it receives. These agreements are discussed in <br /> detail in note 9 to the financial statements. Additionally, the Agency incurred expense for interest on the <br /> Tax Allocation Bonds in the amount of $2.3 million. <br /> 6 <br />