AgdaPkt 2011-01-24 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

MpNITORING VERIFICATION IDENTIFIED 1MPACT RELATED MITlGAT10N MEASURE Implementation Monitoring and Timing Signature Date Performance Criteria Entit Verification Entit Re uireme�ts the historical resource and the effect may cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of that resource, CEQA will require preparation of a"second tier," site- specific EIR for that project, unless it is determined that the significant impact can be mitigated to a less- than-significant level. The City shall refrain from approving a future project that is determined to have a significant effect on a historic resource if it is deiermined that there are feasible alternatives or mitigation measures that can substantially lessen or avoid those effects. if the City aflirmatively determines that there are no feasible alternatives or mitigation measures that will reduce the effect to a level of insignificance, the City shall issue a slatement of overriding considerations. No purpose can be served by attempting to prepare such site- specific project impact assessment at this first tier stage when future development projects remain unspecified and uncertain. Implementation of mitigation measures {a) through (f) above can be expected to reduce the poteniial adverse impacts to historic resources from implementation of the DPP to lhe maximum extent feasible. However, given the uncertainiy with respect to the condition of and circumstances surrounding the historic resources at the time future development projects are proposed that would affecl such resources, and without knowing the speci(ic design characteristics of such future develo ment ro osals, the .. Page 7 C:IDocumenfs and 3eflingsHpassanis�lLocal SettingslTemporary fnfemet Frles10LK49lmmchf (10671).doc