Laserfiche WebLink
8.0 <br /> ExlE3���110 � <br /> • Impact 9-17: Cumulative Impact on BroadwaylChestnut Street <br /> Intersection <br /> � Impact 9-18: Cumulative Impact on Broadway/Woodside Road <br /> Intersection <br /> � Impact 9-19: Cumulative Impact on Bay Road/Woodside Road <br /> Intersection <br /> • Impact 9-20: Cumulative Impact on Bradford Street/Main Street <br /> Intersection <br /> • Impact 9-22: Cumulative Impact on Veterans Boulevard/Woodside Road <br /> Intersection. <br /> � Impact 9-23: Cumulative Impacts on Freeway Segments. <br /> • Impact 9-24: Cumulative Impact on Freeway Ramp Operations. <br /> • Impact 13-1: Flooding Impacts Related to Sea Level Rise <br /> B. Findings Regarding Alternatives Analyzed in the FEIR <br /> In light of the City's goals and objectives for the Project, and given that the <br /> Project is expected to result in certain significant environmental effects even after the <br /> implementation of alI feasible mitigation measures, the City hereby makes the following <br /> findings with respect to its adoption of the modified Downtown Precise Plan proposed by <br /> the Planning Commission, which consists of the proposed project described in the EIR, as <br /> modified by the changes described as Alternative 4 and Alternative � in the EIR. <br /> 1. Alternative 1-- No Project Alternative <br /> a) Findings. The No Project Alternative is described and discussed <br /> at pages 19-2 and 19-18 to 19-20 of the Draft EIR. The No Project Alternative is hereby <br /> rejected because (a} it would not avoid or substantially lessen any of the proposed DPP's <br /> significant effects and (b) it is infeasible because it would not achieve the City's goals <br /> and objectives for the Project. <br /> b) Explanation. The No Project Alternative is <br /> described and discussed at pages 19-2 and 19-18 to 19-20 of the Draft EIR. This <br /> alternative assumes that the new DPP would not be adopted and that the City's cunent <br /> zoning standards and regulations for the downtown area would remain in effect (subject <br /> to minor amendments to achieve consistency between current zoning and the newly- <br /> adopted 2010 General Plan). As a result, existing development patterns would largely <br /> remain intact and there would be no substantial changes in land use, density, or intensity <br /> patterns within the plan area. <br /> S:1RF..SOLl1TI0I�S`12eso. 2092 CEQA Findings Yor DPP F.xhibit B.doc 50 <br /> 012011 <br />