Laserfiche WebLink
6.1 C <br /> Page 12 <br /> Mr, Tom Passanisi, A�CP <br /> December 17, 2010 <br /> Page 3 <br /> (new Books I and III not yet availabie); and (c) July 15, 2010 (also <br /> dated June 2010) PHED Test Run Draft (new Books I and III <br /> available for first time). <br /> Each of the above DPP submirials was reviewed by Wagstaff/MIG, <br /> and necessary revisions integrated into the latest version of the <br /> EIR. In effect, the ElR project description information (the contents <br /> of the OPP) evolved during the EIR process as staff revised and <br /> refined the plan. (Please note that even DPP revisions that might <br /> have been considered minor had "ripple effects" in preparing the <br /> EIR, since so much of the EIR information is integrated and cross- <br /> referenced.) This concurrent revise-refine-review-integrate <br /> process befinreen City staff and Wagstaff/MIG was not envisioned � <br /> in aur contract scope, but ultimately proved necessary, considering <br /> the City's timeline for completion of both the DPP and Draft EIR. <br /> (Note: Ses item #6 below in reference to another version of the <br /> DPP released on August 31, 2010.} <br /> 4. EIR Analysis of Three New City-IdenEified Alternatives. $8,055.82 <br /> The approved scope of work included analysis of four altematives <br /> to the proposed DPP. During EIR preparation, City staff requested <br /> the analysis of three additional altematives: (a) Alternative 4-- <br /> Revised Maximum Allowable Development (M.A.D.) Caps; (b) <br /> Alternative S--Revised Historic Resource Preservation Regulations; <br /> and (c) Revised DPP Area Boundary. With the iniEial descriptions <br /> provided by City staff, Wagstaff/MIG incorporated the new � <br /> alternatives into the EIR and evaluated their potential impacts. i <br /> 5. City-Requestec! EIR Editoria! Reformatting for $7,�18.77 <br /> Screencheck Phase. The approved scope of work included a <br /> Table of Confents and associated editorial format and sequence <br /> similar to the 2006 Draft EIR. At City requesf for the Screencheck <br /> EIR, Wagstaff/MIG reformatted the cumulative impacts discussion <br /> from each indfvidual environmental topic chapter in the <br /> Administrative Draft EIR and consolidated the discussion into a <br /> separate EIR chapter (Cumulative Impacts, chapter 17). Both <br /> approaches meet CEQA requirements. Also at City request for the <br /> Screencheck phase, the separate "Project Consistency wlth Local <br /> and Regional Plans" chapter in the Admin, Draft EIR was <br /> efiminated and that information integrated into the various relevant <br /> environmental topic chapters. <br /> 6. At4endance at Historic Resources Advisory Commitfee $6,444.66 <br /> (HR�4C) Meeting and Subsequent Incorporation of HRAC <br /> Comments at Ffnaf E!R Phase. The City HRAC discussed and <br /> took action on recommended revisions to the Draft EIR after the <br /> document was released for public review (i.e., Draft EIR released <br /> on August 39, 2010; HRAG meetings were �onducted on <br /> September 9 and 15, 2010). Almost all of these revisions resulted <br /> from the HRAC's consulting a revised version of fhe DPP (dated <br /> T.•41067!!tp-12-17-10 le(ter (10671). doc <br />