My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
CC Min 2003-04-14 Reg
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2003
>
CC Min 2003-04-14 Reg
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/6/2011 2:58:51 PM
Creation date
6/12/2003 11:41:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
4/14/2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mario Martins stated that four years ago many within the downtown area were in <br />support of the project. He stated that the plan today is much different from the plan <br />presented and agreed upon four years ago. Just as the various businesses being <br />affected by this project are requesting more time to negotiate and look for space, <br />he stated that the City should step back and make sure it is doing the right thing. <br />He further stated that it has been proven in the past that whenever Jefferson <br />Avenue is impacted by delay or reconstruction the downtown area businesses are <br />affected. <br />Alan Bygdnes stated that he has consistently heard at meetings that there will not <br />be a left hand turn off of Jefferson into the entrance of the underground parking <br />garage. The alternative is to then come down Jefferson, make a left hand turn at <br />Middlefield to a three -lane road, going down the propose one way street next to <br />the restaurants. He stated his belief that this is not the proper way to go to get <br />around the block and into the parking garage. He asked for clarification of the DDA <br />section that states when any development occurs on Block 2, the City will need to <br />build a comparable parking facility within the orange zone and that will add to the <br />traffic and parking problem. <br />City Manager Everett stated that there is a requirement in the DDA that when <br />Block 2 is developed, we must replace the 300 parking places currently on Block 2. <br />There are multiple ways to meet that requirement such as shared parking on Block <br />2 or parking somewhere else in the orange zone that encompasses approximately <br />a six by six block radius. The parking stalls can also be placed underground below <br />Block 2 if that proves financially feasible. <br />Council asked various questions of staff and made comments. <br />Economic Coordinator Webb stated that in 1998, there was a joint study session <br />with Council, Planning Commission and Architectural Review Committee. At that <br />time, criteria were developed for an RFP that went out in August of 1998 where <br />proposals were submitted by four developers in October 1998. The proposals were <br />reviewed, narrowing down to three as being the most viable, and requested <br />business proposals from those three. Of those business proposals, the narrowing <br />came down to two developers of which the Cinema Committee and City Council, <br />as a whole, spent considerable amount of time interviewing, discussing and <br />questioning the two proposals prior to the final decision. She confirmed that both <br />original parking designs submitted by competing developers were from Nick Watry. <br />She further stated that at the time a parking garage was considered on Block 2 <br />with a couple of entrances. <br />M/S Ruskin /Hartnett to not re -open the question of the design of the Jefferson <br />Garage under the Retail /Cinema project. The motion passed by a majority roll <br />call vote with Council Member Jordan voting no and Vice Mayor Ira absent. <br />REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />MINUTES <br />APRIL 14, 2003 <br />PAGE 7 <br />MINUTES Book No. 59 <br />Page No. 440 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.