Laserfiche WebLink
S.A -0 <br />Mr. Brower wanted to confirm that the motions being made do include the fact that the <br />proposed Ordinance is in the public interest. <br />Chair Foust concurred, and said she would repeat the language. She said as we are <br />moving theso forward by separate motion, as stated earlier, are in the public interest and <br />recommend adoption of these Amendments to the City Council who has the ultimate <br />decision. <br />ACTION <br />Commissioner Piulle — Yes <br />Commissioner Paulson — Yes <br />Commissioner Seybert — Yes <br />Commissioner McCoy — Absent <br />Commissioner Radcliffe — Yes <br />Commissioner Garcia — Yes <br />Chair Foust - Yes <br />Motion Passed 6-0 <br />Amendment No. 4 — Definitions and Allowance of Theater Uses in the Central Business <br />Retail District <br />M /S: Garcia/Radcliff <br />ACTION <br />Commissioner Piulle — Yes <br />Commissioner Paulson — Yes <br />Commissioner Seybert — Yes <br />Commissioner McCoy — Absent <br />Commissioner Radcliffe — Yes <br />Commissioner Garcia — Yes <br />Chair Foust - Yes <br />Motion Passed 6 -0 <br />Amendment No., 5 — Provision to Accommodate Child Care Facilities <br />M /S: Garcia/Seybert to approve Option 3 (with a hearing and notice) <br />DISCUSSION <br />Mr. Passanisi wanted it to be made clear that by asking for Plan 3 they were asking for <br />Public Hearing and notice, and would require a permit. <br />Commissioner Garcia concurred, as it would be in the public interest. <br />Commissioner Piulle — asked who would send out the notice; City or applicant? <br />Mr. Brower said he believes it is the City will be providing the notice. <br />Commissioner Garcia asked how far is the notification range? <br />Mr. Passanisi said that typically they do 300 feet. <br />Mr. Brower said State law says a radius of 100 feet of the exterior boundaries of the <br />proposed Large Family Day Care home. <br />Page 19 of 26 <br />