My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2003-06-23
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2003
>
AgdaPkt 2003-06-23
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/2/2011 2:45:19 PM
Creation date
6/19/2003 1:23:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Agency Type
City Council
Date
6/23/2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
196
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
q,A -7 <br />indicate that the City has granted any variances for flat parcels of standard shape and size <br />that back up to open space. Homes that were built in other cities with different regulations, <br />setback requirements, and policies related to open space are not precedents for any <br />development in Redwood City (Appellant's Issue G, Other Cities). <br />Third Variance Test: Intent of the Zonina Ordinance: <br />Lastly, the Zoning Administrator must establish that the approval of the requested variance <br />will not be contrary to the intent of the Zoning Ordinance. As previously stated, the subject <br />property currently complies with all applicable Zoning standards with respect to setbacks, <br />lot coverage, height, and parking requirements. The subject property is of substantial size <br />and has the ability to accommodate additional square footage within the required building <br />envelope, without the need for a variance. <br />The general purpose of setback requirements is to create buffer, or transition space <br />between land uses, and to optimize the physical relationship of adjacent uses. In the public <br />hearing and submittal materials, the applicant suggested that the buffer was primarily <br />needed between homes, and thus, since the park is wide, there is no need to maintain the <br />rear yard setback in this area since it would not affect any residential neighbor to the rear. <br />However, staff believes that since the adjacent land use is a City park, intended for the use <br />and benefit of the general public, a transitional space between public and private land uses <br />is at least as important as it is between homes (please see additional discussion under <br />Administrative Process: Previous Variances, below). Furthermore, the subject property's <br />relationship to the adjacent open space could be constituted as an added convenience <br />and /or benefit and therefore does not represent a hardship or a condition that would <br />deprive the property of the ability to develop. By requiring a twenty (20) foot rear yard <br />setback the code is ensuring that the transitional space between the subject property and <br />the public park will be maintained, which preserves the aesthetic quality of this important <br />public amenity. (Please refer to Appendix 6, Site and Vicinity Photos.) <br />In addition to transitional space, the twenty (20) foot rear yard setback establishes a <br />consistent pattern of rear yards of a size deemed to be consistent with the purpose of low <br />density single - family residential zoning districts. The twenty (20) foot rear yard setback, <br />when consistently applied, protects adjacent neighbors from excessive wall lines that could <br />block solar access and views out of the property (e.g. sky and territorial views). This <br />setback requirement supports the purpose of the R -1 Zoning District, as stated in Article 5 <br />of the Zoning Ordinance "to stabilize and protect the residential character of the district and <br />to promote and encourage a suitable environment for family life on a neighborhood basis." <br />Therefore, staff and the Zoning Administrator consider the granting of the variance to be <br />contrary to the intent of the Zoning Ordinance. The Ordinance amendment in 1990 <br />increased the rear yard setback requirements to twenty (20) feet to establish a transitional <br />buffer to adjacent land uses (in this case, a City park) and to create the desired pattern of <br />rear yards which allow for substantial access to light/views unhindered by side walls from <br />neighbors' properties. <br />Administrative Process <br />Administrative Record: <br />From the first point of contact with Community Development Services staff at the counter, <br />planners have advised the applicant to submit a design that conforms to the Zoning <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.