My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2003-06-23
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2003
>
AgdaPkt 2003-06-23
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/2/2011 2:45:19 PM
Creation date
6/19/2003 1:23:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Agency Type
City Council
Date
6/23/2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
196
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
q.A -12 <br />ATTACHMENT 1 <br />required day light plain provisions of the Zoning Ordinance (along with all <br />other applicable requirements) the subject property could support <br />approximately 1,900 square feet. — <br />A combination of one, two, or all three of these design alternatives could <br />result in a substantial addition and represents a build -out potential similar to <br />other homes in the area on the same sized parcels. <br />Consequently, granting of the variance would be considered a special <br />privilege in contrast to development standards imposed on other 6,500 <br />square foot R -1 lots in the neighborhood. <br />In addition, Ordinance 1130.273, effective November 15, 1990 established a <br />rear yard setback requirement of twenty feet. Prior to this ordinance being <br />adopted the rear yard setback requirement for properties zoned R -1 was six <br />(6) feet. Therefore, any construction prior to the adoption of this ordinance <br />would be considered legal non - conforming. Any construction proposed on a <br />parcel zoned R -1 following the adoption of this ordinance would be subject to <br />the twenty (20) foot rear yard requirement. <br />Homes that were built with setbacks less than twenty (20) feet prior to the <br />ordinance amendment in 1990, are not considered to be precedent cases. <br />Homes that were built with setbacks less than twenty (20) feet with variances <br />granted due to irregular parcel shape are also not precedent cases. <br />3. The Zoning Administrator must establish that the approval of the requested <br />Variance will not be contrary to the intent of the Zoning Ordinance. <br />The purpose of the R -1 Zoning District as stated in Article 5 of the Zoning <br />Ordinance is to stabilize and protect the residential character of the district <br />and to promote and encourage a suitable environment for family life on a <br />neighborhood basis. <br />As previously stated the subject property currently complies with all applicable <br />zoning ordinances with respect to setbacks, lot coverage, height, and parking <br />requirements. The subject property is of substantial size and has the ability to <br />accommodate additional square footage within the required building envelope <br />(without the need for a variance). <br />One of the intentions of a twenty (20) foot rear yard setback is to preserve <br />open space between land uses. The proposed fifteen (15) foot rear yard <br />setback would minimize the amount of buffer, or transitional space, between <br />the existing single - family residence and the community park (Mariner Park) <br />located behind the subject property. By requiring a twenty (20) foot rear yard <br />setback the code is ensuring that the transitional space between the subject <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.