My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2003-06-23
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2003
>
AgdaPkt 2003-06-23
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/2/2011 2:45:19 PM
Creation date
6/19/2003 1:23:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Agency Type
City Council
Date
6/23/2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
196
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
/0.14-/8 <br />BUDGET IMPACTS from page 1•••••••••• ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• <br />City officials responded quickly. Many reported <br />significant impacts to public safety and other ser- <br />vices as a result of their own tight budgets — even <br />before a huge cut 1 the magnitude currently under <br />consideration by the legislature. State cuts, on top <br />of already- reduced local revenues, would slash <br />deeply into essential services. <br />Below are just a few of the messages city officials <br />delivered to their legislators this week. <br />$500, 000 to be cut from current budget. Crime <br />prevention sergeant eliminated. Results are slower <br />response to cmergencies and traffic enforcement, <br />and elimination of crime prevention and school <br />education efforts. In FY 03 -04, library staffing will <br />be reduced 18% with hours cut by 17 %. Parks <br />and recreation activities serving youth and seniors <br />will be similarly cut. State cut of $250,000 would <br />mean eliminating 3 additional staff, which could <br />further impact these services. <br />(How much would your city lose? Visit the <br />State Budget page at www.cacities.om / budget to see <br />city -by -city estimates, using a VLF allocation for- <br />mula.) <br />City has already cut 46 capital projects and <br />cut operating budget. Proposed state cut would <br />mean equivalent of losing 20 police officers, entire <br />budget for senior, youth 8 family services combined. <br />In redevelopment, would mean equivalent ofinvest- <br />ment in 73 low - income housing units. <br />• (Our city's) police department must already <br />absorb $1 million hit in budget over the next two <br />years. Police services are already stretched thin <br />while crime, population and demand is growing. <br />Since September 11, police department has been <br />asked to do more with less. Any budget strategy <br />that contemplates on -going contributions by cities <br />will have overwhelmingly negative impacts and result <br />in fewer police officers on patrol. <br />• FY 03 -04 budget just being completed and <br />given uncertainty of state cuts we have difficulty <br />determining whether to submit the 10 police officers <br />or 20 officers planned <br />• A potential cut of $400,000 could mean: <br />eliminate four police positions (including two offic- <br />ers); reduce staffing for teen program; eliminate <br />summer playground program. <br />The current economic downturn forced our <br />city to make midyear reductions in January 2001. <br />Capital improvements including police, fire and <br />public works projects were halted. Freeze on <br />positions has eliminated 9% of workforce. Patrol <br />operations are currently at minimum acceptable level <br />and may need to be reduced to meet additional <br />• The FY 03 -04 adopted budget already <br />makes significant cuts in street maintenance, <br />operating budgets and capital projects. The <br />potential additional state cut of $630, 000 after <br />current budget reductions would translate to 6 <br />Police officers from a force of 42. <br />• Asa result of reduced revenues and <br />increased costs, city has already cut two police <br />officers for 03 -04. Any attempts at on -going cuts <br />will adversely impact (our city's) public safety. <br />Redevelopment increments are fully committed to <br />public improvements and affordable housing in <br />downtown area, so and state reduction of RDA will <br />be direct hit to city general fund. <br />• Potential state hit of $964,000 equates to <br />11 % of fire and marine safety budget, 11 % of law <br />enforcement services budget, 19% of parks and <br />recreation and 60% of public works. No one <br />department would suffer the entire revenue loss <br />"hit" but it can be anticipated a multi -year reduc- <br />tion would affect all departments and services. <br />City is willing to shoulder some of financial <br />problem this year though any ongoing revenue <br />shift will destroy possibility of providing essential <br />services. <br />Small city of 7,000 that serves regional <br />population of 20,000 in a rural area. General fund <br />of $4.5 million with only about $200, 000 from <br />property taxes. Economically hard hit by the <br />closure of largest industry, and decline in fishing <br />industry. Just recovered from 3 -year plan to <br />eliminate previous $600,000 deficit and $1 million <br />interfund loans. Already must recommend elimina- <br />tion of one police officer position. Additional state <br />cut would be mean reduced staff that serves the <br />community. <br />Continued on Page 7 <br />PAGE 6 /PRIORITY FOCUS Visit the League's Official Web Site-- www.cacities.org <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.