My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2003-06-30
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2003
>
AgdaPkt 2003-06-30
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/2/2011 2:41:59 PM
Creation date
6/26/2003 2:33:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Special
Agency Type
City Council
Date
6/30/2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
166
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
IsYour <br />Utility <br />Users Tax <br />Ordinance � <br />Ready for the <br />21st Century ? <br />by Donald H. Maynor <br />xtraordinary changes are <br />taking place in many of the <br />utility industries. To accommo- <br />date these changes, California <br />cities need to modernize their <br />utility users tax (UUT) ordi- <br />nances or run the risk of losing <br />existing and future tax revenues. <br />This article discusses the nature <br />of the industry changes, the im- <br />portance of periodically updat- <br />Ing the UUT ordinance, and the <br />need for an effective tax en- <br />forcement program. <br />Major Changes In Utility Regulation, <br />Competition and Technology <br />About 35 years ago, a small number of Califor- <br />nia cities began imposing an excise tax, known <br />as a utility users tax, on the use of certain util- <br />ity services within their cities. Today, more <br />than 160 cities and counties have enacted util- <br />ity users tax ordinances, imposing a UUr on <br />such services as electricity, gas, water, tele- <br />phone, telegraph, cable television and garbage <br />service. These California public agencies re- <br />ceive more than $12 billion in tax revenue from <br />this source to help pay for essential govern- <br />mental services. <br />As some may recall, there were only ahand- <br />ful of monopoly (Le., regulated) utility provid- <br />ers in California in the early 1970s. These quasi - <br />public institutions were willing to tolled the <br />cities' utility users taxes from the utility cus- <br />tomers, and diligently remit the UUr to the <br />city where the usage took place. Thanks to the <br />cooperation of these large, regulated utility <br />companies, the UUr collection process was eb <br />ficient and dependable. <br />Donald H. Maynor is an Atherton-based attor <br />ney u*o specializes in utility law He also assists <br />Municipal Resource Consultants, a subsidiary <br />ofMBU, in providing tax compliance services <br />to mom than 60 California public agencies rr <br />garding their utility users tax ordinances and <br />utilityJraachises. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.