My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2011-03-21
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2011
>
AgdaPkt 2011-03-21
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/13/2012 1:17:21 PM
Creation date
3/17/2011 2:52:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Redevelopment Agency
Date
3/21/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
126
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
6.1 B <br /> Page 14 <br /> Condition. In general, the condition of each tree will be recorded in one of the following <br /> categories adapted from the rating system established by the International Society of <br /> Arboriculture: <br /> Excellent 100% <br /> Very Good 90% <br /> Crood 80% <br /> Fair 60% <br /> Poor 40% <br /> Critical 20% <br /> Dead 0% <br /> Maiatenance need. The following maintenance categories will be collected: <br /> 1. Prioritv 1 Removal. Trees designated for removal have defects that cannot be cost- <br /> effectively or practically treated. T'he majority of the trees in this category has a large <br /> percentage of dead crown and pose an elevated level of risk for failure. Any hazards <br /> that could be seen as potential dangers to persons or property and seen as potential <br /> liabilities to the client would be in this category. Large dead and dying trees that are <br /> high liability risks are included in this category. These trees are the first ones that <br /> should be removed. <br /> 2. Prioritv 2 Removal. Trees that should be removed but do not pose a liahility as great <br /> as the first priority will be identified here. This category would need attention as <br /> soon as "Priority One" trees are removed. <br /> 3. Priority 3 Removal. Trees that should be removed, but that pose minimal liability to <br /> persons or property, will be identified in this category. <br /> 4. Prioritv 1 Prune. Trees that require priority one pruning are recommended for <br /> trimming to remove hazardous deadwood, hangers, or broken branches. These trees <br /> have broken or hanging limbs, hazardous deadwood, and dead, dying, or diseased <br /> limbs or leaders greater than four inches in diameter. <br /> 5. Priority 2 Prune. T'hese trees have dead, dying, diseased, or weakened branches <br /> between two and four inches ia diameter and are potential safety hazards. <br /> 6. Laree Tree Routine Prune. These trees require routine horticultural pruning to correct <br /> structural problems or growth patterns which would eventua!!y obstruct traffic or <br /> interfere with utility wires or buildings. Trees in this category are large enough to <br /> require bucket truck access or manual c(imbing. <br /> 7. Small Tree Routine Prune. T'hese trees require routine horticultural pruning to correct <br /> structural problems or growth patterns which would eventually obstruct trafftc or <br /> interfere with utility wires or buildings. These trees are small growing, mature trees <br /> tlaat can be evaluated and pruned from the ground. <br /> 8. Tra.inin Prune. Young, large-growing trees that are still small must be pruned to <br /> correct or eliminate weak, interfering, or objectionable branches in order to minimize <br /> future maintenance requirements. These trees, up to 20 feet in height, can be worked <br /> with a pole pruner by a person standing on the ground. <br /> 9. Stump Removal. This category indicates a stump that should be removed. ' <br /> Prepared for Ury of Redwood City, Califomia ��, <br /> Prepared by Davey Resource Group I <br /> II <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.