Laserfiche WebLink
1ka <br />AIR RESOURCES BOARD PROPOSES REGULATION FOR <br />RETROFIT OF DIESEL GARBAGE TRUCKS <br />In mid -June, the Air Resources Board (ARB) <br />issued draft regulations to require public and <br />private diesel garbage truck fleets to be retrofitted <br />to reduce particulate air emissions. This is part of <br />an ongoing effort by the ARB to address the prob- <br />lem of air pollution from diesel trucks. The ARB is <br />taking a fleet by specific fleet approach to this task. <br />Most recently, the ARB completed adoption of <br />regulations that covered transit fleet buses. <br />The proposed ARB rule would apply to both <br />garbage trucks that are owned and operated by <br />public agencies (i.e., the city provides the garbage <br />collection service itself), and to those fleets that are <br />owned and operated by private waste haulers who <br />operate in the jurisdiction by exclusive or non- <br />exclusive franchise, permit or contact. Retrofit <br />would be phased in over several years. In its <br />current form, the proposed rule is highly objection- <br />able to local governments, since it requires the <br />local agency to serve as the enforcement and <br />inspection agency for the ARB. It would require the <br />local agency that regulates the rates of a waste <br />hauler to do all of the following: <br />Report to the ARB the names, addresses <br />and detailed garbage truck fleet information of all of <br />its contractors that serve the municipality; <br />• Report to the ARB a description of the total <br />cost and funding source to be used to bring the <br />contractors into compliance; <br />Submit an annual report to the ARB that <br />includes a signed statement by the contractor that <br />it is in compliance with the ARB rule, a signed <br />statement by the municipality stating that the <br />signed statements by the contractors have been <br />received, and information about contractors that <br />are not in compliance. <br />A violation by the municipality would subject it to <br />civil penalties. <br />Interestingly, the waste industry also is strongly <br />opposed to the part of the proposed rule that <br />covers fleets that are rate regulated. They are <br />concerned that in communities in which they oper- <br />ate under a rate regulated system (i.e., an exclu- <br />sive franchise), they are required to comply with the <br />retrofit, but have no assurance that they will receive <br />any rate increase to cover their cost of compliance. <br />League staff has discussed the proposed <br />regulation with a representative of the waste <br />industry and a staff at Cal EPA. Both the League <br />and waste industry representative explained our <br />individual objections and intention to strongly object <br />to the proposal. At its recent meeting, the League's <br />Environmental Quality policy committee discussed <br />the proposed rule, as well as elements of a possible <br />alternative approach. Based upon that discussion, <br />the League, CSAC and the Regional Council of <br />Rural Counties will communicate to the ARB to <br />object to the regulations as originally proposed and <br />suggest the following proposal. <br />• Object strenuously to the regulations as <br />originally proposed <br />• Clarify that the following only applies to <br />waste hauling fleets that operate under rate regula- <br />tion in a community. <br />• Waste hauler fleets would develop a retrofit <br />implementation plan, including identification of Best <br />Available Control Technology and cost, and submit <br />the plan to the ARB for review. <br />• ARB would approve or certify the implemen- <br />tation plan. <br />• The waste hauler could submit the ARB <br />approved /certified plan to the jurisdiction with <br />franchise authority as a cost of compliance part of <br />its business plan. <br />This approach is attractive because it removes <br />the local agency from any enforcement role, which <br />should be the responsibility of the ARB. It does not <br />abrogate any contracts or franchises, and retains <br />the usual rate review relationship between the <br />hauler and local government. Cities that contract <br />with waste haulers for solid waste services and <br />regulate the rates should consider writing the ARB <br />to oppose the proposed regulations and instead <br />support the above alternative approach. Written <br />comments must be received by the ARB no later <br />than 12:00 noon, July 23, 2003. They should be <br />addressed as follows: Air Resources Board, 1001 <br />"I" Street, 23rd Floor, Sacramento, CA 95814. <br />Visit the League's Official Web Site -- www.cacities.org PRIORITY FOCUS /PAGE 5 <br />