Laserfiche WebLink
Legislative Bill Action <br />................................ ............................... <br />SB 966 could result in monetary exposure to local <br />public entities for decisions and determinations <br />that are not within their control. Under current law, <br />cities are not liable to contractors who bid on a <br />project based on the mistaken, good faith belief <br />that it does not qualify as a "public works project" <br />for purposes of the prevailing wage laws, unless a <br />city may be liable if it has intentionally misled the <br />contractor to believe that the project is exempt. <br />SB 966 makes public agencies solely responsible <br />for any mistake made in the evaluation of whether <br />or not a project is subject to the prevailing wage <br />requirement. This determination is increasingly <br />complex, and we understand changes in wage <br />rates that, particularly in redevelopment deals, <br />some developers prefer to take the risk of the <br />uncertain application of prevailing wages. Under <br />these circumstances, the owner should not be <br />responsible for any cost increase the contractors <br />incur - they have no control over. Please let us <br />know if you city has any concerns with this bill. <br />Staff: Natasha Fooman; Status:AsLab &Emp; <br />Hrg -7/9, Position: Oppose. <br />AS 872 (Strickland). Speed Limits. AS 872 <br />amends Sec. 627 of the CVC by adding "persons <br />at work" to roadway users whose safety can be <br />considered by the local authority in setting speed <br />limits, and also clarifies that the local authority is <br />the entity that can consider the safety of roadway <br />users in applying the 85th percentile methodology. <br />AB 872 passed the Assembly by a vote of 77 -0. <br />The bill does not implement a new prima facie <br />speed limit or change the use of the 85th percen- <br />tile methodology in setting speed limits. Support <br />letters have been received from public agencies <br />and private utilities whose employees are required <br />to work in and adjacent to roadways, and whose <br />safety is endangered by high speed drivers. Staff: <br />Natasha Fooman; Status: SenTrans; Hrg -7/8, <br />Position: Support. <br />AS 299 (Lowenthal). Vehicles. Taxicabs and <br />Passenger Vehicles for Hire. Violations. <br />Impoundment. Charter -Party Carriers of <br />Passengers. Advertisement as Taxicabs. AS <br />299 Requires a magistrate, when presented with <br />an affidavit from a peace officer ^.stablishing rea- <br />sonable cause to believe that a vehicle is being <br />operated as a "for hire" taxicab or passenger <br />vehicle in violation of local licensing requirements, <br />to issue a warrant or authorize the peace officer to <br />seize the vehicle in question. It also requires that <br />the vehicle be impounded for a period up to 30 <br />days, with the impounding agency notifying, within <br />two working days, the legal owner of the vehicle. <br />Additionally, AS 299 was amended to prohibit a <br />charter -party carrier of passengers from advertis- <br />ing or otherwise representing their services to the <br />public, as a taxicab or taxi service. The City of Los <br />Angeles is the sponsor of the bill. Staff: Natasha <br />Fooman; Status: SenTrans; Hrg -7/8, Position: <br />Support. <br />AS 327 (Runner). Vehicles: Parking. Persons <br />with Disabilities. Violations. AS 327 increases <br />the penalty for violating statues related to disabled <br />persons' parking privileges AS 327 raises from <br />$250 to $500 the minimum fine for the improper <br />use of disabled persons' distinguished license <br />plates or placards. It also raises from $250 to $500 <br />the minimum fine for illegally parking in a stall or <br />space designated for disabled persons and dis- <br />abled veterans. The author points out that current <br />punishment for abusing disabled placards were <br />established in 1992 and are increasingly failing to <br />serve as an effective deterrent. Assembly Member <br />Runner believes that the low minimum fines en- <br />courage people to take their chances when faced <br />with otherwise limited parking opportunities. There- <br />fore raising the minimum fine will serve as a deter- <br />rent as well as raise local revenues. Staff: <br />Natasha Fooman; Status: SenTrans; Hrg -7/8, <br />Position: Support. <br />AS 792 (Yee). Vehicles. Removal Storage. AS <br />792 expresses the legislative intent regarding the <br />removal, tow, and storage of a vehicle. When the <br />Legislature required all vehicles storage facilities to <br />accept valid bank credit cards, it was Legislature's <br />intent to assist vehicle owners or their agents to <br />make such payments for towing and storage <br />services and expedite the recovery of towed ve- <br />hicles to promote the safety and welfare of the <br />PAGE 14 /PRIORITY FOCUS Visit the League's Official Web Site -- www.cacities.org <br />