My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2002-04-08
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2002
>
AgdaPkt 2002-04-08
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/5/2005 2:52:10 PM
Creation date
4/5/2002 8:15:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Agency Type
City Council
Date
4/8/2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
72
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
7.3 Section - Claims and Warrants <br /> <br /> Reject the claims of Hugo Tumios, claim no. 1986 and Cynthia Mitchell, claim no. <br /> 1994 as submitted; MINUTE ORDER 02-81 <br /> <br /> B. Approve warrants dated through April 1, 2002 and usual and necessary payments <br /> through April 8, 2002; MINUTE ORDER 02-82 <br /> <br /> 7.4Section - Ordinances (None) <br /> <br /> 8. MATTERS OF COUNCIL INTEREST- <br /> <br /> 8. A. Legislation - This sub-section involves possible discussion of City Position on <br /> Proposed Legislation Described in the League of California Cities Priority Focus <br /> Bulletin No. 12-2002. Council may direct staff to act on positions taken by Council. <br /> (Copies of League of California Cities Priority Focus available in City Clerk's <br /> Department).. <br /> <br />9. STUDY SESSION ITEMS <br /> <br /> A. Draft Capital Improvement Program Budget; <br /> <br /> City Manager Everett gave a brief introduction stating that this is a draft CIP and <br /> will come back to Council at least two more times, in late May and July. <br /> <br /> Public Works Services Director/Assistant City Manager Ingrain explained the <br /> format for the presentation and that the budget is a draft. He stated discussion of <br /> the ClP would occur first with questions and answers with Council, then on to the <br /> new priorities. A PowerPoint presentation was used to illustrate the major projects <br /> that are entirely funded at this time. <br /> <br /> Council questions and comments ensued. <br /> <br /> B. Feasibility Analysis of new .City Council Priorities; <br /> <br /> Public Works Director/Assistant City Manager stated that feasibility information on <br /> costs and impacts on staffing has been provided and Department Heads are <br /> present to answer any questions. Other information provided was a matrix of <br /> potential funding opportunities for the new priorities, information on current status <br /> and projecting out two years of finances as it applies to both the ClP and monies <br /> that would be available to ultimately apply to those new priorities. <br /> <br />REGULAR COUNCIL MI:I=] lNG APRIL 1, 2002 <br />MINUTES PAGE 3 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.