My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2011-05-02
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2011
>
AgdaPkt 2011-05-02
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/11/2011 12:14:49 PM
Creation date
4/28/2011 2:59:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Redevelopment Agency
Date
5/2/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Ms. Maureen Riordan <br />March 29, 2011 <br />Page 2 <br />City from Stanford University; the City recorded this amount on July 12, 2010 as a <br />"deposit into already existing cost recovery account." <br />Additional Fee: $22,644.00 <br />B. Two Additional Visual Simulations (Environmental Vision and Wagstaff /Mll <br />The original EIR scope included three (3) computer - generated visual simulations by <br />Environmental Vision, the EIR visual simulation consultant, with EIR analysis and text by <br />Wagstaff /MIG; this work was completed. Subsequently, City staff authorized an added <br />scope and budget for Environmental Vision to complete a fourth simulation, 'from the Bay <br />Road /Douglas Avenue intersection vantage point ($3,300). After this simulation was <br />completed, City staff authorized another added scope and budget increment for a fifth <br />simulation from a more distant vantage point, the intersection of Bay Road/Third <br />Avenue. That simulation has also been completed ($3,050). For the EIR document, <br />City staff decided to replace the Bay /Douglas simulation with the Bay/Third simulation <br />(i.e., the EIR includes a total of four simulations). Wagstaff /MIG added a discussion of <br />the impact implications of the additional, Bay Road/Third Avenue visual simulation to the <br />EIR. The City received additional funding from Stanford University for both of these <br />added simulations, one ($3,300) on August 26, 2010, the other ($3,050) on October 26, <br />2010. <br />Additional Fee: $6,350.00 <br />C. Peer Review of Stanford University Reports ( Illingworth & Rodkin and <br />Wagstaff /MIG) <br />After - the Air Quality and Climate Change EIR chapters had been prepared by <br />Wagstaff /MIG and reviewed by City staff, Stanford University submitted to the City a <br />Human Health Risk Assessment and its own greenhouse gas emissions report. City <br />staff authorized peer review of the two reports by Illingworth & Rodkin, EIR air quality <br />and climate change consultant. The peer review included a memo of findings from <br />Illingworth & Rodkin, subsequent discussions between Illingworth & Rodkin and <br />Stanford, and report revisions by Stanford. Wagstaff /MIG incorporated appropriate <br />additional findings into the EIR Air Quality and Climate Change chapters. This added <br />scope and budget item was authorized by City staff via email on December 8, 2010. <br />The work has been completed. <br />Additional Fee: $5,190.00 <br />D. Additional (Fifth) Review Cycle of Draft EIR Based on Incorporation of New <br />Information <br />After the Screencheck Draft EIR was submitted to City staff in December 2010 (in <br />preparation for printing the public release Draft EIR), new information was developed for <br />incorporation into the EIR, including the following: (1) the City retained outside CEQA <br />counsel to comment on the EIR; (2) new direction was provided from City staff regarding <br />certain environmental issues pertaining to the project (e.g., emergency water storage <br />requirements, traffic mitigation details, revised Precise Plan standards); and (3) based <br />T. 1106721 mr -3 -29- 11(10672). doc <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.