My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Minutes 1955
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Minutes
>
1955
>
Minutes 1955
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/25/2016 10:11:22 AM
Creation date
5/3/2011 4:30:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
1/1/1955
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
298
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
403 <br /> been approved by the State Highway Department, subject to approval of the pending <br /> Supplemental Memorandum of Agreement for additional funds. It is the Engineer's <br /> recommendation that the City Manager be authorized to advertise for bids immediately <br /> on this project. <br /> Due to the liability which might be incurred by the City in formally approving any <br /> rearrangement which would permit parking of trailers across the walkway, parking and <br /> traffic lanes, it is our recommendation that the streets be constructed to a width <br /> of 6o feet between curbs, as per plans and specifications and to conform to the rest <br /> of Broadway. Any liability incurred by such parking of vehicles would then be the <br /> responsibility of the owner and/or driver of the vehicle, and not that of the City. <br /> Councilman Jones questioned Mr. Jain in regard to other meetings with the warehouse <br /> people. Mr. Jain replied that he had not had any further meetings because he knew <br /> the feelings of the Council before taking any further action. He stated that the <br /> State had challenged the 60' street as they had given approval for a 6L1.' street. <br /> City Engineer explained that the street on either end of the proposed widening was <br /> 60' wide. Councilman Jones moved acceptance of the City Engineer's report and author- <br /> ized the City Manager to advertise for bids, seconded by Councilman Granger. Mayor <br /> Herkner stated that he had gone out in the field and discussed this matter at some <br /> length to the end that there was a possibility of extending the dock 6' within his <br /> building. City Engineer Jain stated that if he still wants to extend the dock and <br /> assume the liability he would have no objections, however, it would not improve the <br /> situation to any great extent. <br /> After further discussion regarding a 6' dock and a 23' dock, City Attorney Currie <br /> stated that they should let them work out their own problems and then the City would <br /> not be liable. Motion carried. <br /> CITY ENGINEER REGARDING CANAVESE RESUBDIVISION OF LOTS, 14, 15, and 16, OAKWOOD PARK, <br /> between Roble Avenue and Oakwood Drive south of Carlos Avenue. In his letter, <br /> Mr. Jain stated that the Planning Commission, at its meeting of July 26, 1955, <br /> approved a tentative map subject to the following: <br /> 1. 30 -foot pavement between curbs. <br /> 2. No sidewalks required. <br /> 3. .0 -foot radius to be provided on eul de sac. <br /> L�.. Drainage, water and sewer facilities to be approved by the City Engineer. <br /> City Engineer Jain offered the following comments and recommendations: <br /> 1. Roble Avenue, from which this cul de sac extends, is 1,000 feet in length, and <br /> is served by only a 2 -inch and 1 2 inch water main. Action by the Council on <br /> August 1, 1955, required that the developer of Glenfair Subdivision at the end of <br /> Roble Avenue should pay 25% of the cost of a 6 -inch water main in the present Roble <br /> Avenue, the City to pay the remaining 75%. It is our opinion that the Canavese Sub- <br /> division should pay its share of this water main also, or at least share the 25% with <br /> Glenfair Subdivision. <br /> 2. The developer of Glenfair Subdivision is being required to construct standard <br /> 3t -foot pavement and standard sidewalks, and all other improvements required by the <br /> Subdivision Ordinance. <br /> 3. The tentative plan indicates that the lots, as proposed to be subdivided, are <br /> sufti'iciently large to provide full 34 -foot pavement, 5 -foot sidewalks, and 45 -foot <br /> radius turnaround as required in similar small cul de sac subdivisions. <br /> The Engineer Department feel that the Canavese Subdivision should be treated in the <br /> same manner as other subdivisions of this type, with the requirement for complete <br /> plans and specifications, and construction of improvements as required by the Sub - <br /> division Ordinance. <br /> Councilman Spillers was of the opinion that this should be set for a study meeting. <br /> City Engineer Jain stated that Mr. Eichler was in the audience when the Planning <br /> Commission considered the matter. In a similar case, the Planning Commission had <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.