My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Minutes 1955
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Minutes
>
1955
>
Minutes 1955
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/25/2016 10:11:22 AM
Creation date
5/3/2011 4:30:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
1/1/1955
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
298
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
25s <br /> PUBLIC HEARING. APPEAL FROM THE PLANNING COMMISSION GRANTING OF USE PERMIT TO D. M. HOOKER, <br /> 833 Main Street. Mr. Paul F. Kelly, Attorney, appeared in behalf of Mr. Hooker, stating <br /> that he had received a Use Permit from the Planning Commission. He also received a lic- <br /> ense from the City Collector of Redwood City, after which he opened for business. The <br /> City Attorney advised that the procedure for this appeal was correct, and stated that <br /> Ordinance boo provides for a Use Permit for selling used and second hand goods. An appeal <br /> may be filed within thirty days of application for permit. Ordinance 147 as amended by <br /> Ordinance 188, provides that no one can engage in the business of pawn broker, dealer in <br /> second hand goods, etc. unless they have the approval of the City Council. Mr. Kelly, <br /> not waiving any rights, stated that Mr. Hooker would apply to the City Council if that is <br /> the law. Mr. Thomas Tuite, Jr. appeared and stated that the only interest of himself and <br /> the other property owners in the area was to keep the property desirable, and they feel <br /> that this type of business is undesirable and would tend to decrease the value of the pro- <br /> perty. Councilman Britschgi moved that public hearing be closed, seconded by Councilman <br /> Royer and carried. Councilman Granger moved that the application for a Use; Permit, re- <br /> quested through his attorney, be denied, seconded by Councilman Britschgi and carried on <br /> roll call. City Attorney advised the Council to show that: 1. In addition to public <br /> hearing, records show that pictures were passed to the Council and examined. 2. That <br /> they deny permit under Ordinance 147, as amended in Ordinance 188, permit to sell second <br /> hand goods. 3. City Collector be directed to return the $50.00 to applicant which he <br /> put up for his permit. Councilman Britschgi moved denial of permit under Ordinance 147, <br /> as amended by Ordinance 188, seconded by Councilman Royer and carried. Councilman Jones <br /> then moved that the City Collector refund the $50.00 fee, seconded by Councilman Stout <br /> and carried. Councilman Granger moved that records show that Mr. Hooker put up only <br /> $50.00 for his permit. <br /> PUBLIC HEARING: MR. A. H. MORGAN APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE REDWOOD CITY TAZPAYERS ASSOCIATION <br /> AND READ A LETTER REQUESTING THE RESIGNATION OF COUNCILMAN JONES AND APOLOGY FROM COUNCIL- <br /> MAN BRITSCHGI AND MAYOR HERKNER as an aftermath of the recent bond election. Councilman <br /> Spillers moved that the letter be made part of the record and filed, seconded by Council- <br /> man Granger and carried, Councilman Jones disqualifying his vote. <br /> Redwood City, California <br /> February 12, 1955 <br /> "Members of the Redwood City Council, <br /> City Hall, Redwood City, California <br /> Gentlemen: <br /> During the heat of a political battle, some times remarks might be <br /> made that may very well be rectified by an apology that would be accept- <br /> able to either side. <br /> However, if one is to pursue along the same lines as his remarks, then <br /> there is nothing left but for us to believe that they will continue to func- <br /> tion along the same lines. This was brought out in an article in the local <br /> paper dated February 9. Quote, "I think that what I did was correct" unquote. <br /> Thus,.there was no alternative.but for me to appear before this Council in <br /> defense of one of our citizens. <br /> So that I may not be misquoted, or misunderstood, I have put in writing <br /> the remarks that I wish to make to the Council, to wit: <br /> In the regular Council session last Monday night, February 7, Councilman <br /> Paul Jones did publicly propose an action which I believe was not only in <br /> extreme bad taste, but I considered was unlawful, unamerican and in violation <br /> of the Bill of Rights. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.