Laserfiche WebLink
9. A -H <br />Legislative Bill Action <br />................................ ............................... <br />The following are summaries of just a few of the legislative bills that are currently being acted upon <br />by 'he League of California Cities. For more information about these and other bills, please visit <br />the League website's new "Issues and Advocacy" page (www.cacities.ora/ <br />issuesandadvocacv) — a one -stop location to access information about legislation, policy issues <br />and related developments. You can track information on bills (www.cacities.org /legtracking), <br />locate legislators and legislative committees, send letters to legislators or the media through the <br />online Advocacy Center, research League policy positions, access useful related links, and much <br />more. <br />HOUSING AND LAND USE <br />SB 707 (Florez). Environmental Quality. <br />Large Dairy Cow Farms. SB 707 prevents any <br />environmental impact report or negative declara- <br />tion from being approved for any project that <br />includes the construction or expansion of large <br />dairy cow farms within 3 miles of a city, school <br />district, or census area with over 5,000 people <br />unless specific conditions are met. Prior approval <br />of an EIR or negative declaration, the lead agency <br />must consult with and provide notice to affected <br />cities and other stakeholders. In addition, the <br />environmental impact report or negative declara- <br />tion must establish a "buffer zone." This buffer <br />zone is considered to be a designated area where <br />construction of new dairy farms, or expansion of <br />existing ones is prohibited. Other mitigation <br />measures that similarly protect public health, <br />safety, welfare and the environment can be out- <br />lined instead of creating a buffer zone. In addition, <br />if a city, county, or school district (as defined) find <br />by resolution of their respective councils or boards <br />that a dairy farm construction or expansion project <br />will have adverse impacts based on substantial <br />evidence, the public agency may not approve the <br />project. SB 707 explicitly defines "large dairy <br />farms," and "expansion" for the purposes of the <br />bill. <br />SB 707 was introduced because of concerns, <br />primarily in the San Joaquin Valley, that dairy <br />farms increase the presence of harmful particu- <br />lates in the air, which can have an adverse affect <br />on the health of individuals in the surrounding <br />areas, especially on those residents with asthma. <br />SB 707 opponents insist that the requirements <br />outlined by the legislation may nullify portions of a <br />county's general plan, and that such requirements <br />are duplicative relative to existing federal, state <br />and local laws. In addition, opponents are con- <br />cerned that SB 707 constrains the lead agency's <br />authority to determine mitigation measures that <br />are consistent local needs. Staff: Dan Carrigg, <br />Status: AsApps;Hrg -8/20, Position: Review and <br />Comment. <br />AB 1426 (Steinberg). Sacramento Region. <br />Affordable Housing Standard. The League Board <br />of Directors opted to oppose AB 1426 at its recent <br />meeting because the bill imposes significant new <br />housing production mandates on local govem- <br />ments in the Sacramento region without providing <br />local governments with the resources they need to <br />meet the new requirements established by the bill. <br />In brief, the bill requires at least 10 percent of new <br />building permits within the Sacramento region to <br />be built for low and very low- income households. <br />While the goal of the bill is laudable, it ignores the <br />reality of how this new mandate will be paid for. <br />Affected local governments have estimated the <br />total subsidy cost to the region at over $500 million <br />over a five -year period, and higher when recent <br />state - imposed prevailing wage requirements are <br />factored in. Without resources, affected local <br />governments will have to increase fees and <br />impose stringent inclusionary zoning requirements <br />on the development community. <br />Although it its current form this bill only applies <br />to the Sacramento region, it mirrors in some <br />respects the controversy generated by last year's <br />AB 680 (Steinberg), where communities beyond <br />Visit the League's Official Web Site -- www.cacities.org PRIORITY FOCUS /PAGE 11 <br />