Laserfiche WebLink
p ,4-rf <br />Legislative Bill Action <br />................................ ............................... <br />The following are summaries of just a few of the legislative bills that are currently being acted upon <br />by the League of California Cities. For more information about these and other bills, please visit <br />the League website's new "Issues and Advocacy" page (www.cacities.ora/ <br />issuesandadvocacv) — a one -stop location to access information about legislation, policy issues <br />and related developments. You can track information on bills (www.cacities.org /legtracking), <br />locate legislators and legislative committees, send letters to legislators or the media through the <br />online Advocacy Center, research League policy positions, access useful related links, and much <br />more. <br />ENVIRONMENTAL <br />SB 20 (Sher Electronic Waste, The eagerly <br />awaited amendments to SB 20 are now in print and <br />available. 532Q would establish a statewide program <br />to collect and recycle electronic wastes. It would <br />bifurcate this responsibility between collection and <br />recycling of hazardous electronic devices. The newly <br />amended bill, which the League is still studying, <br />includes the following main elements. <br />SB 20 would cover all cathode ray tubes (i.e., <br />televisions and computer monitors) and any other <br />video display device (i.e., notebook computers) with a <br />screen size of four inches or more. It would require <br />manufacturers, retailers, consumers, local govern- <br />ments, non - profit organizations and waste haulers <br />would share the responsibility for developing, financ- <br />ing and operating a -waste collection programs that <br />are "free and convenient' for consumers. It is impor- <br />tant to note that while local governments would be <br />involved in this process, SB 20 does not mandate <br />direct involvement of cities in the collection infrastruc- <br />ture. <br />As amended, SB 20 would impose a point of sale <br />e -waste collection fee, ranging until January 1, 2006, <br />from $3 to $10, depending upon the size of the CRT. <br />After that date, the waste board would establish the <br />collection fee based at a level that is sufficient to <br />generate revenues to cover the costs of an autho- <br />rized collector for collecting, consolidating and <br />transportating the a -waste in a manner that is cost - <br />free and convenient to the consumers. Funds from <br />this fee would be used to provide payments to local <br />governments, non - profit groups and others for the <br />collection and consolidation of e- waste. Cities would <br />be required, at the next revision of their AB 939 <br />household hazardous waste element, to "...identify <br />those actions the city is taking to promote the collec- <br />tion, consolidation, recovery, and recycling of hazard- <br />ous electronic waste." <br />SB 20 would also require manufacturers of CRTs <br />to develop a plan that demonstrates how they will <br />establish a system to accept, process and safely <br />recycle a -waste from "collectors." These plans would <br />be approved by the California Integrated Waste <br />Management Board. As an alternative, manufacturers <br />would have the option of paying a fee to cover the <br />cost of recycling devices that are sold in California. <br />Local agencies would be eligible to receive funds <br />from the Waste Board to cover the cost of collection <br />and consolidation and to dean up illegally disposed <br />e- waste. Funds would also be available to manufac- <br />turers to encourage consumers to return the devices <br />for processing or recycling. <br />The bill also includes provisions to phase out the <br />use of hazardous materials in electronic consumer <br />devices, to prohibit manufacturers not in compliance <br />with the provisions of SS 20 from selling to the State <br />of California, and to prohibit the export of a -waste that <br />is not properly recycled. <br />Interested cities should review the July 29 version <br />of SB 20 carefully and send their comments to the <br />author and the League's Sacramento office. The <br />League will continue to study the amendments, <br />suggest modifications to the author as needed, and <br />work with interested stakeholders as the bill moves <br />forward. League Staff: Yvonne Hunter, Status: <br />AsApps, Position: Support. <br />Visit the League's Official Web Site-- www.cacities.org PRIORITY FOCUS /PAGE 15 <br />