AgdaPkt 2003-08-25 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

E3 A -9� Commissioner Seybert asked what the process would be for a "meeting of the minds ", if Kaiser and the City did not agree as to what Kaiser's fair share (based on the impacts) would be. Mr. Church said there would first be an informa discussion between the applicants, hopefully with some agreement with the numbers. He said, ultimately, under the law, there is a requirement that the City prove that there is a nexus between the charges and the generation of the impact. He said depending on how much of an argument there is about those costs, there will more or less be an elaborate report that will go the City Council for final approval, and the argument would get laid out there. Chair Foust asked for a motion. Commissioner Seybert asked Assistant City Attorney Damien Brower what the motion was supposed to be. Mr. Brower said it is what the PC is looking at in the Recommendation. There are two actions to either recommend or not recommend: Review the revised wording in the Precise Plan and recommend that the City Council adopt the Downtown Medical Campus as amended. 2. Find the Zoning Map Amendment to rezone the real property at the Kaiser Permanente Downtown Medical Campus from "CA" (Commercial Administrative) and "CB" (Central Business) to 'P" (Planned Community) Zoning District to be in the public interest and recommend that the City Council approve the Zoning Map Amendment. Mr. Brower said it should be two different votes. M /S: (Radcliffe /Seybert: That the PC vote on the Precise Plan with the revisions as noted, and recommend approval of the Precise Plan. Motion passed 5 -0 (McCoy and Piulle — Absent) M /S: (Paulson /Seybert: That the PC find that the Zoning Map Amendment to rezone the real property of the Kaiser Permanente Downtown Medical Campus from "CA" (Commercial Administrative) and "CB" (Central Business) to a "P" (Planned Community) and zoning District to be in the public interest and recommend that the City Council approve the Zoning Map Amendment. Motion passed 5 -0 (McCoy and Piulle — Absent) 5. MATTERS OF COMMISSION INTEREST a. 852 -860 Walnut Avenue: Discussion on changes to previously approved 15 unit infill project. Zoning Administrator Jill Ekes said since the PC last saw this matter, the Precise Plan, (Zoning Map Amendment) was approved by the City Council. She said the project was sold to a new developer, who is looking to do a similar project, but with some changes. Ms. Ekas said staff wanted to inform the PC of those changes before staff comes back for Planned Community Permit. She referred to the memo Page 4 of 7