My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2003-08-25
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2003
>
AgdaPkt 2003-08-25
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/2/2011 2:26:21 PM
Creation date
8/21/2003 3:19:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Agency Type
City Council
Date
8/25/2003
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
260
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
conclusion, he stated that it is his best medical judgment that the proposal to use <br />recycled water for the purposes outlined poses no credible medical risk for the <br />residents of San Mateo County. <br />PWS Director Ingram summarized that recycled water is not new in California, in <br />the country or the world and has a long and safe history, especially in the state of <br />California. He displayed a map showing some of the major sites throughout the <br />state with recycled programs in place and described many of the projects. He <br />concluded with saying that a reliable water supply is an essential benefit to our <br />community that assures the city's future and the well being of our citizens. He <br />strongly recommended adoption of the resolutions and approval of the project in <br />the near future. <br />Council questions ensued and included why our water allocation is so unfair to the <br />city's residents versus other communities obtaining water from the SFPUC, <br />property disclosure requirements, emerging components, cost benefit analysis and <br />the qualifications of Dr. Atkinson -Barr. <br />Recess: 9:52 -10:16 p.m. <br />Mayor Claire reiterated the rules for public comment and asked Council to amend <br />the rules to allow for individuals up to nine minutes if speaking on behalf of others <br />whether present or not. <br />Public Comment: <br />Clem Molony, an environmental health and safety manager for 25 years with 20 <br />years of expertise in water and toxics, stated he mentions his credentials to those <br />who are sincerely concerned with whether there is validity to the health hazards <br />issue. He stated that he has studied the Safewater Coalition's questions, the <br />addendum answering those questions, attended every meeting and is saddened <br />that the Safewater Coalition has been misrepresenting and exaggerating the toxics <br />issue for a year. He stated that there is no health hazard from his studies and the <br />presentations and thanked the Coalition for asking the questions and City Council <br />for answering the questions. <br />Dennis Wolfe, as a proponent of recycled water, gave accolades to Dr. Deresinski <br />and stated that there is a dilemma as to whether recycled water is safe. He stated <br />that it is important to answer that question because it is going to impact the <br />community. He asked that Council drink the water that was on display and find out <br />which side is presenting accurate evidence. <br />Ron Crates, speaking as a resident of Redwood City and having served as the <br />Redwood City School Superintendent for the last 14 years in Redwood City, stated <br />that he has some experience on the topic. He stated that he had served as <br />Superintendent in the Phoenix area where water really is the issue and irrigation <br />with recycled water was the norm. He stated that he never heard of any child or <br />REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING JULY 28, 2003 <br />MINUTES PAGE 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.