Laserfiche WebLink
ATTACHMENT 1 8IR 7 <br />H. Adopt Resolutions Endorsing Passage of Proposition 12 and Proposition 13; <br />i) RESOLUTION 13832 ENDORSING PASSAGE OF PROPOSITION 12, SAFE <br />NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS, CLEAN WATER AND COASTAL PROTECTION BOND <br />ACT OF 2000; <br />ii) RESOLUTION 13833 ENDORSING PASSAGE OF PROPOSITION 13, SAFE <br />DRINKING WATER, CLEAN WATER, WATERSHED PROTECTION AND FLOOD <br />PROTECTION BOND ACT OF 2000; <br />I. Approve warrants dated through February 14` 2000 and usual and necessary payments <br />through February 28', 2000; NHNUTE ORDER 00 -188 <br />The motion passed by a unanimous roll call vote by those present. <br />E. MIS Howard/Ira to adopt RESOLUTION 13834 ESTABLISHING SUBMITTAL DATE FOR <br />PROPOSED BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2000 -01, SETTING TIME AND PLACE FOR <br />HEARING THEREON, AND ESTABLISHING DATE OF ADOPTION OF THE FINAL <br />BUDGET FOR SAID FISCAL YEAR; <br />And <br />Revise Study Session No. 1 date from June 7 to June 5, 2000. The motion passed by a unanimous <br />roll call vote by those present. <br />4. PUBLIC HEARING — <br />A) Public Hearing on Zoning Text Amendment Relating to Large Family Day Care Homes: <br />Principal Planner Passinisi explained the City currently requires a nondiscretionary permit <br />for large family day care homes. The City grants the permits when certain conditions are met <br />that pertain to providing parking, drop off and pick up areas, fire and State requirements and <br />to be sure there are no health and safety effects on the neighborhood. The current process <br />developed in 1991, acknowledging the need for the day care homes, has no notification <br />requirement for surrounding property owners, no publication requirement, no spacing or <br />concentration requirements, no cost and the permit is obtained over the counter. The <br />Planning Commission and Council subcommittee are recommending a slight <br />recommendation to this process, a required use permit. The use permit requires the City <br />notify property owners within 100 feet and if requested, there could be a formal public <br />hearing. This recommendation occurred because of a large family day care home that used a <br />private access easement over an adjoining property owners lot to access the large family day <br />care home. Another proposal offered was for the applicant to notify surrounding property <br />owners and the City only require proof. Upon proof and agreement to comply with the <br />standard provisions, approval would be granted. Unlike the Planning Commission <br />recommendations, there would be no public hearing or fees associated with the permit. In <br />summary. the approach presented would take less time, be less expensive but still provide <br />notice to the surrounding property owners by the applicant. <br />REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES <br />FEBRUARY 14, 2000 <br />PAGE <br />