Laserfiche WebLink
ATTACHMENT 5 6•J� <br />V <br />He id hne was concerned about lowering a water consumption and raising the rates. <br />He do not want to pay for the increased tes, due to increased population brought <br />about b ew projects. He feels the new in h itants of the projects should take the hit, <br />not the p le who are already here paying my fo• the water usage. He said he <br />would like th \maVer considered. <br />Paul Sanfilipwood City Resident (961 W ide Road) asked how this water <br />supply issue act ABAG's housing supply numb ? <br />Chair Foust said theselquestions would be answered in latqr documentation <br />Chair Foust informed the <br />water and upcoming proje <br />of the information on <br />City Website regarding <br />Mr. Passanisi requested a <br />restart the computer. <br />Chair Foust said we would resume a\8:25 p.m. <br />5. ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT - PUBLIC HEARING <br />Proposed Amendments to the Zoning Ordinance related to: <br />1. The Construction of Arbors and Trellises in Setback Areas. <br />2. Definitions, Land Use Classifications, and Parking Standards for Medical Offices, <br />Medical Clinics, and Research and Development Uses. <br />3. Definitions and Standards for Measurement of Residential Height. <br />4. Definitions and Allowances for "Theater" Uses in the Central Business Retail (CBR) <br />District. <br />5. Provisions to Accommodate Child Care Facilities. <br />Chair Foust asked Tom Passinisi, Principal Planner, to give an overview. <br />Mr. Passanisi said the purpose of these five Zoning Text Amendments is to essentially <br />clean up the Zoning Ordinance, bring it to conformance with common and acceptable <br />development practice, and also to clarify some of the Planning language. He said the <br />Amendments are pretty straight forward, but he wanted to elaborate on the Large Family <br />Child Care Ordinance Amendment. <br />He said the published Zoning Ordinance as it relates to Large Family Child Care simply <br />needs to be changed. Per an opinion by the City Attorney's office, the current wording in <br />the Zoning Ordinance does not conform to State law, and does not meet the intent of <br />past City Council action. He said a recent Grand Jury Report recommended that the <br />City amend the Ordinance to comply with State law. The City Council's original intent <br />was to establish a Non - discretionary Permit Process; however, the wording in the <br />current Ordinance reflects a Use Permit Process, meaning it requires notification and a <br />Public Hearing. <br />Page 5 of 26 <br />