Laserfiche WebLink
touch with humans and finally use it in parks and front yards. He read a letter into <br />the record dated July 22, 2003 from Gossamer Village Owners Association. <br />Alan Bygdnes stated that he has lived in Redwood City for 73 years and things <br />have changed. Citing statistics, he stated that the current drought is manmade <br />created by the City. The city is currently using water at a rate of 10% over its water <br />allotment, the 10% increase in living units, plus the new offices and realty spaces <br />at Pete's Harbor will add approximately 11 % more demand on the city's water <br />supply. The staff solution is to build a $43 million plant to recycle sewer water for <br />Redwood City and Redwood Shores. He stated his problem with Item 8B is that <br />staff proposes using recycled water that is contaminated with surviving infectious <br />organisms and chemicals for irrigation of parks, playgrounds and sporting fields in <br />Redwood Shores and Redwood City. In summary, he asked that a revision be <br />added that prohibits the use of recycled sewer water on parks, playgrounds and <br />swimming pools in Redwood City or Redwood Shores. Secondly, he asked that the <br />resolution be changed to reflect this revision. <br />M/S Ira /Howard to extend the meeting to 11:30 p.m. The motion passed by a <br />unanimous voice vote. <br />Dr. Martin Atkinson -Barr stated that Dr. Deresinski displayed contemptuous <br />behavior unbecoming Bob Parkhurst asked whether the report was obsolete or <br />not. He asked if the decision is being made at this time, why is the purple pipe <br />being installed on the freeway. He asked if a reasonable choice could be made to <br />not use recycled water in playgrounds. <br />Rudy Luca asked how the City is not going to use more water with the various <br />developments being planned. He asked the Council to reject the proposal. <br />Laleh Shahideh thanked Council for responding to her e-mail and stated she <br />moved to Redwood Shores in November. She stated that had she known about <br />the project, she would not have purchased the property. She stated that based on <br />her findings as director of student services at the University of San Francisco, she <br />checked with her colleagues in the environmental studies program and <br />environmental science, and asked the Council to oppose the project pending <br />further investigation. She gave many suggestions and points to consider. <br />Kate Eckhardt stated she is not a proponent; she is a realtor with a biomedical <br />background. She stated that Mr. Pentano spoke in error. She stated that all the <br />diseases we know are related and the correlation will be drawn. She further stated <br />that you cannot ruin an area for the benefit of another and that it is unconstitutional <br />and unfair housing. <br />Tom Bornheimel stated that democracy works and we use too much water. He <br />stated that 40% of the increase occurred in Redwood Shores. He further stated <br />REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING JULY 28,20M <br />MINUTES PAGE 11 <br />