My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2003-08-25
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2003
>
AgdaPkt 2003-08-25
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/2/2011 2:26:21 PM
Creation date
8/21/2003 3:19:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Agency Type
City Council
Date
8/25/2003
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
260
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
monitoring of adverse effects of pharmaceuticals on the skin has not been <br />addressed by the experts. <br />Marjorie Parkhurst suggested either placing the q- jestion on the ballot or a <br />compromise where each side goes home feeling tl�at the Council works for all <br />citizens of the city. She suggested that the residents replace much of their lush <br />landscaping with drought resistant plants, replace all non playground lawns on City <br />and County property with water friendly groundcover. Recycled water could then be <br />used along freeways, road medians, landscaping next to the streets, complexes <br />and banks, wetland restoration, cement industry for dust control and in golf <br />courses. <br />Tamara Piulle, Planning Commission speaking as a Redwood City resident, <br />strongly supported the implementation of the recycled water project. At the <br />Planning Commission hearing there was not as much opposition, but she has not <br />changed her position. She stated that the City cannot stop development in <br />Redwood City because of lack of water. She urged Council to vote for the project. <br />Mark McLaren, Redwood Shores resident, stated that the documents on the <br />website are outdated and painting a rosy economic picture of the project. He stated <br />that the project relies on 100% acceptance of recycled water in all of the identified <br />sites within Redwood Shores. He stated surprise that the economic analysis had <br />not been revised based on the Council decision to make recycled water non - <br />mandatory. He summarized that you can get where you need by other means, it will <br />be more costly, there is a need to take a different look at it and the cost benefit <br />analysis must be a serious part of the equation given what is already known. <br />M/S Ruskin /Pierce to extend the meeting to 1:15 a.m. The motion passed by a <br />unanimous voice vote. <br />Recess: 12:30 -12:45 a.m. <br />Alina Cherny, resident at Laguna Point, gave an example of her 6 year old triplets <br />that became sick after playing at a playground in a condominium complex in San <br />Jose where the sprinklers were on. They became sick that night and it was <br />documented. <br />Greg Greenway, representing the Seaport Industrial Association, stated that the <br />members are generally supportive of the project and those who have investigated <br />the feasibility have found that they could do so. All of the companies contacted <br />about the project indicated that they were comfortable with the safety of their <br />employees in contact with recycled water. He stated that he is not a resident of <br />Redwood City, he is a concerned and conscientious parent of a one year -old and <br />they play in a park regularly that is irrigated with recycled water. He stated that he is <br />convinced by the data that shows that over half a century in hundreds of <br />communities there has been no harmful effects from the use of recycled water <br />REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING JULY 28, 2003 <br />MINUTES PAGE 14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.