Laserfiche WebLink
8. A16 <br />LEAGUE BYLAWS AMENDMENTS CONSIDERED AT ANNUAL CONFERENCE <br />Annual Conference resolution #1, sponsored <br />by the League board of directors, proposes several <br />amendments to the League bylaws. The impetus <br />to amend the bylaws at this time came in Ma; when <br />the League held what is b=lieved to be its first ever <br />"special" membership meeting. Traditionally, <br />League members gather at the annual conference <br />to make League policy. <br />The Administrative Services Policy Committee <br />reviewed and approved the bylaws amendments <br />during its June meeting. Therefore, the committee <br />will not be meeting at the Annual Conference. The <br />League Board reviewed and approved the pro- <br />posed amendment with one change. The board <br />expanded opportunities for service on the League <br />Board with respect to at -large board membership. <br />The League bylaws provide for special meet- <br />ings, but include scant procedural direction for <br />these meetings. As a result, the League board <br />adopted policies to fill the gaps for May's special <br />meeting and requested that the bylaws be re- <br />viewed with respect to these issues as well as the <br />issue of voting thresholds. <br />In addition, the League's regional divisions <br />have generally been placing a greater emphasis <br />on governance, updating and expanding their own <br />bylaws. There are a few proposed changes to <br />allow for greater flexibility for division bylaws. <br />Other areas in which amendments are pro- <br />posed include: quorums, at -large board mem- <br />bership, the resolution process, officer elec- <br />tion timing and the bylaws amendment pro- <br />cess Notice of the proposed bylaws changes also <br />was included on page 20 of the August issue of <br />Western City. <br />All the proposed bylaws amendments have <br />been incorporated into resolution #1. Amendments <br />to the bylaws require approval by two- thirds of <br />voting delegates participating in the General <br />Assembly of the League. The General Assembly <br />will be held at 10:00 a.m. Wednesday, September <br />10 during the Annual Conference in Sacramento. <br />Each member city has one vote in the League's <br />General Assembly. <br />Before consideration by the General Assembly, <br />the General Resolutions Committee will review all <br />the resolutions and recommend League action to <br />the general assembly. The General Resolutions <br />Committee will meet at 10:15 a.m. on Tuesday, <br />September 9 and will either recommend approval <br />or rejection of the proposed amendments. City <br />officials interested in the bylaws amendments or <br />any other resolutions are invited to these meetings, <br />where they will have an opportunity to raise ques- <br />tions and recommend action. <br />Copies of the resolutions packet, including a <br />summary of the bylaws amendments and a redline <br />version of the proposed bylaws were mailed to all <br />cities on July 30. The resolutions are also avail- <br />able on the League's website at the following link: <br />www.cacities.ora/2003resoltitions. <br />STATE SEEKS DISMISSAL OF <br />VLF LAWSUIT <br />The State of California has filed a response <br />to the lawsuit challenging the restoration of the <br />vehicle license fee to 1998 levels, which was <br />brought July 1 by the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers <br />Association (HJTA) and others. The State's <br />response, called a demurer, was filed on August <br />22. It asks that the lawsuit be dismissed, and <br />argues that the HJTA and others failed to allege <br />compliance with the legal prerequisites for <br />bringing a tax refund lawsuit. <br />The basis for the State's request for dis- <br />missal is this: California law requires a taxpayer <br />to take preliminary steps before contesting the <br />fee increase. First, the taxpayer must actually <br />pay the fee. Second, the taxpayer must request <br />a refund of the fee. And finally, the State must <br />deny the request. Because the HJTA and the <br />others that filed the suit have not taken these <br />preliminary steps, the State contends that they <br />cannot sue at this time. <br />The State's request will be considered on <br />October 7 in Sacramento County Superior <br />Court. The League will continue to monitor the <br />lawsuit and keep cities informed of the court's <br />ruling. Contact Stephen Traylor, Assistant <br />General Counsel, League of California Cities at <br />(916) 658 -8281 or stravlorna_ cacities.oro if you <br />have questions. <br />Visit the League's Official Web Site-- www.caci ties. org PRIORITY FOCUS /PAGE 3 <br />