Laserfiche WebLink
6-423 <br />Legislative Bill Action <br />................................ ............................... <br />AB 1625 (Benoit). Vehicles. Seat Belts. <br />Fines. AB 1625 could potentially increase state <br />and local revenue generated by penalty assess- <br />ments and surcharges added to the base fines for <br />seat belt use violations. AB 1625 increases the <br />maximum penalty fine for an initial penalty from <br />$22 to $65. It also increases the maximum <br />penalty for repeat violators of the seat belt law <br />from $55 to $140. Additionally the increase in <br />fines could potentially act as a deterrent for none <br />seat belt users. The bill passed out of Senate <br />Appropriations on 8/25/03 by a vote of 7 -2. Staff: <br />Natasha Fooman, Status: SenFlr, Position: <br />Support. <br />AB 625 (Spitzer) Towing. Storage Charge. <br />AB 625, which could negatively impact a city's <br />contracts with tow companies, is now a two year <br />bill. The League will continue to work with the <br />author to amend the bill next year. We encourage <br />cities to send input on how to improve the bill to <br />the League. Staff: Natasha Fooman; Status: <br />SenApps, Position: Oppose. <br />SB 966 (Alarcon). Prevailing Wages on <br />Public Works: Contractor's Cost. Amendments <br />made to SB 966 on 8/26/03 do not eliminate the <br />problem of making a public agency liable when it <br />does not explicitly require the developer to pay <br />prevailing wages, even in cases where the public <br />agency is uncertain as to whether the prevailing <br />wages are required. However, the amendments <br />lessened this problem for redevelopment agen- <br />cies, which have now removed their opposition. <br />For cities and other agencies, the bill could cost <br />local agencies millions of dollars a year in added <br />costs and penalties that should have been paid by <br />others. For more information, and to view copies <br />of the League opposition letters, please visit the <br />League's website at www.cacities.oro /leatrackina. <br />Staff: Natasha Fooman, Status: AsApps; Hrg -8/ <br />28, Position: Oppose. <br />HOUSING AND LAND USE <br />Don't Forget AB 1160 and SB 744: As the <br />legislative session winds down, cities should be <br />aware that there are two controversial land use <br />bills likely to be revived. Although AB 1160 <br />(Steinberg) and SB 744 (Dunn) are two- year - bills, <br />they can move quickly in the next session. The <br />League has opposed AB 1160 and SB 744 and <br />strongly urges cities to go on record in opposition <br />before both bills become eligible for action again in <br />January. Sample opposition letters can be found <br />on the League's website at www.cacities.ora /hced. <br />AB 1160 (Steinberg). Second Units /Density <br />Bonuses /Housing on School Sites: AB 1160 <br />proposes a number of state mandates that would <br />limit the ability of local governments to address <br />complex issues associated with locating second <br />units on single - family lots. Although, many local <br />governments are still adjusting to the mandates <br />imposed by last year's AB 1866 (Wriaht). which <br />prohibited public hearings on second unit applica- <br />tions, and created many unresolved legal issues, <br />AB 1160 would go much further in dictating the <br />specifics of these local ordinances: <br />1. Unit size: Requires local governments to <br />permit units up to 1,200 square feet — the size of <br />a three - bedroom home — in every neighborhood <br />in the state. Local governments would have to <br />permit even larger units if the size of the initial <br />single - family home is greater than 3,000 square <br />feet, based upon a 40% ratio. <br />2. All Residential Zones: Requires local <br />governments to permit second units in all residen- <br />tial zones, but impose greater restrictions in <br />certain zones. Besides rezoning many neighbor- <br />hoods in the state, the remainder of this proposal <br />leaves little remaining local authority over these <br />units. <br />3. Parking: Prohibits a local ordinance from <br />requiring more than one parking space for every <br />two bedrooms and authorize the vehicles to be <br />parked on street. Under existing law a local <br />government can require one space per bedroom <br />and an additional parking space if they make some <br />significant findings (topographical, fire, etc.) This <br />bill, reduces parking standards statewide to only <br />one per two bedrooms, plus gives an additional <br />33% discount for being near two bus lines, and <br />PAGE 10 /PRIORITY FOCUS Visit the League's Official Web Site -- www.cacities.org <br />